Amazon.com Customer Reviews
I do not believe this to be a piece of American culture - Review written on July 22, 2008
Rating: 1 out of 5
2 customers found this review not to be helpful.
This is a far cry from the first successful opus, and further the previous success of Eddy Murphy. The story is bland, ultra-conventional and impossible to believe. The sub-zero degree of culture is achieved by the laudatory comments of the French popular papers "Journal du Dimanche" and "Parisien" that qualify this disaster, the back of the jacket of the DVD, "hilarious" and very funny".
Furthermore, if this kind of American cinema had some finesse, he would have been able to make fun of French with intelligence. The criticism of France through the Atlanticist recurring themes of cowardice - our banned sacrifice in Iraq is still difficult to be understood the hawks bushists is vulgar and stupid.
No-sense screenplay, actors alongside the game, total lack of humour, caricature of the American subculture: 0
not as good as the first two, but fun anyway - Review written on June 24, 2008
Rating: 3 out of 5
1 customer found this review helpful.
The action this time takes Lee (Chan) and Carter (Tucker) to France, where there's something about a list of the leaders of the Triads.... oh, you don't care about that--the plot's only there to give a reason for the jokes and the stunts.
Truly, the plot's a bit confusing. A diplomat who gets shot just as he was going to reveal the leaders of the Triads; a list of names tattooed on a woman's head; various factions after Lee and Carter and the woman and each other.
The action and jokes are pretty much what you'd expect if you've seen the first 2 movies. One of the bad guys, however, is Kenji (Hiroyuki Sanada) Lee's "brother" (they'd grown up together), and that provides a nice bit of emotional conflict.
The other thing that distinguishes this movie from the first two is the Paris setting, with a cool action sequence on the Eiffel Tower, but mostly with the sneering Parisian cab driver George (Yvan Attal), who provides even more laughs and ends up making a surprising ally. The addition of his character to the Tucker/Chan duo kept it fresh, not unlike an old married couple with a new audience for their stories. I also really enjoyed his rather skewed view of America--it's not actually all that exaggerated.
It wasn't quite as good as the first two, but it was a fun way to spend an evening--we always enjoy Jackie Chan, even in his cheesiest movies (or maybe that's especially), and as my son's English teacher is wont to say, "Chris Tucker is a funny man."
C'mon, its a mindless martial arts comedy flick, what did you expect! - Review written on May 07, 2008
Rating: 4 out of 5
1 customer found this review helpful, 1 did not.
I find it a bit strange that people are giving this movie a poor rating because the script or plot was weak, well,, to be honest both Rush Hour 1 and 2, were not exactly stellar suspenseful plots or scripts!
Its a basic martial arts, buddy action comedy flick. that's it, and in that aspect, Rush Hour 3 delivers the goods. Granted, its not exactly oscar material, but then again it follows as a decent trilogy to the first 2. I would say the movie was a bit of a letdown more by the support actors apart from these two and the need to film it in Paris.
My favorite is the interrogation of the french triad member by these two in the prescence of the nun.
Chris Tucker - "Yes Sister, his stinkin hairy beads..!" Hilarious!
Maybe They Waited Too Long for Part Three? - Review written on April 10, 2008
Rating: 2 out of 5
4 customers found this review helpful.
This review is from: Rush Hour 3 (Widescreen and Full-Screen)
I really enjoyed Rush Hour 1 and 2. I thought the chemistry between the soft-spoken, but very acrobatic Jackie Chan and the motor-mouth Chris Tucker was very good for the first two films. The first Rush Hour worked well because we saw the culture change Jackie Chan experienced going to the United States and the second Rush Hour was humorous because we saw Chris Tucker experience the culture change in China. For the third and final act (hopefully final), both characters go to France, Europe to experience a new culture for both of them. However since Rush Hour 3 (2007) came nearly six years after Rush Hour 2 (2001) and Rush Hour 1 (1998), it seems the chemistry between Chan and Tucker dried up. I heard rumors that in real life the actors didn't like each other off screen. Hard to believe if there was hatred between them when it looked fun while they were both singing and dancing to the "War" song in part one. If the rumors of their hatred for each other are true, than the efforts in part three can be justified.
Other than the fantastic stunt scene on the Eiffel Tower, Rush Hour 3 looked like a "rushed" effort done only to simply complete a trilogy that perhaps should have never been completed. It seems nowadays all movies that have a part two MUST have a part three so that a trilogy DVD set can be sold in the future. Other than humor that is practically non-existent in part three and no memorable antagonist or villain to counter Chan & Tucker not much worked well. I really wanted to enjoy part three despite the bad theatrical reviews it initially got since I bought the Rush Hour 3 DVD during the Christmas holidays (when the DVD was first available) in order for my wife and I to watch something new on a quite evening alone. I think the film would have worked better if it got a better protagonist or villain to counter Chan & Tucker. By the way I really liked Ziyi Zhang from part two in which she played a great villain (or femme fatale). Perhaps part three could have used another major actor to play the main villain such as Jason Statham (who could have fitted in some sort of Frenchman role) or Jet Li (not that Jackie Chan would have a fighting chance against Statham or Li). In the end I think the producers of Rush Hour 3 truly fumbled with this effort. I think the wait was too long, laughs were few, action ordinary and the effort rushed. 5 stars for part one & two, but only 2 stars for part three.
Very underwhelming. - Review written on March 11, 2008
Rating: 3 out of 5
3 customers found this review helpful, 2 did not.
It's been so, so long since I've watched the other two movies.
To be honest, i remember nothing of the first movie which many think was the best.
Of Part 2 I remember the little asian girl singing Mariah Carey's "Fantasy" in the car. She was JAMMIN'! haha...
And the ending had a casino fight with a few thugs and I remember one of them, probably Chris, fighting this chick who was very good at fighting.
They both were!
But like I said it's been a LONG time so other parts are hazy or non-existent!!
But this movie...it starts off with Tucker directing traffic (he's a police officer this time) and he's singing "Do Me" by an old-school singer, that I can't remember.
It's not Stephanie Mills but it's one who came out around her time, I would think!
The fight scenes were OK, the comedy was OK and the rest had a been there done that feel.
It was underwhelming for sure and I didn't quite get through the whole movie.
I got really tired and I turned it off because it was leaving a lot to be desired.
Shoot me down for not watching the whole thing but that's just how it went down.
Before I leave you though, I must say that this movie was actually pretty racist also. Not towards blacks, but from blacks in a sense. Whoever wrote the script, gave Chris a few lines of "funny" Asian jokes such as the china man and other racist, predictable fodder that was to an extent funny, but not funny enough to be worth saying.
He also has a line where he says to his partner in crime that he knows all he does eat is rice and such.
2.7 stars.
End note: Give me a bad rating if you want but all we have to do is look at the overall score. It reflects my opinion rather well. Don't get me wrong though. It wasn't a total bummer. There were funny parts. It's just that in between all that you were waiting for something...
And the racist lines were rather rampant.
not bad,not bad at all (3.5/5) - Review written on March 02, 2008
Rating: 4 out of 5
1 customer found this review helpful, 1 did not.
from all the negative things i had heard about this movie,i expected it
to be awful.thankfully,that wasn't the case.this movie is actually not
bad.i didn't find it as funny as either the first or second one,but
there were still some pretty funny moments.Jackie Chan gets to loosen
up and show a bit of his silly side.Chris Tucker is funny,as usual.
again there's lots of action of course.the fights are pretty good.Chris
Tucker displays some good martial arts moves in this one.and Jackie
Chan has his usual great movies,although he seems a bit restrained in
this one.there is one mild scene of female nudity,but very brief and
nothing tasteless.i didn't quite like it as much as the previous two
movies,but i still enjoyed it.for me,Rush Hour 3 is a 3.5/5
GOOD ONE FOR BEING THE THIRD... - Review written on February 23, 2008
Rating: 4 out of 5
rush hour 3 made me crack a smile, and at times even laugh out loud like i haven't in a while. comedy is a trip when done right, and in this case it was okay. somethings a little overdone, and others heard to many times, but it did have some freshness that made it a nice one. jackie chan and chris tucker, brilliant duo. i think they're pretty bad azz, you know. they just don't seem to get old for me. chan does the fighting, and tucker does the talking, great pair. these guys are once again brought together to solve a crime, kick some behind, and at times make a fool of themselves. and it works. they head off to paris in search of a bad guy, and they happen to come across the crazy triads, and bump into the french police, who seem to get a little finger happy. again, they're on a mission, risking there tails all the while, and uncovering piece by piece who's behind this whole mess. proving once again, that this mighty twosome still has the power to make me laugh, and trip me out. they can keep them coming. the acting was tight, the fighting was pretty smooth, and overall it went down well.
Wish I could say I liked it - Review written on February 15, 2008
Rating: 2 out of 5
1 customer found this review helpful.
This buddy cop duo of Chris Tucker and Jackie Chan is among the best ever made. I really enjoyed Rush Hour in particular, and Rush Hour 2 was good fun as well. However, this time around, it seems as if the plot of the movie is completely pointless.
Whereas in the first two films the story provided good fodder for letting these two provide hilarious comedy and cool action stunts, now they're left to basically fend for themselves because even the plot itself isn't taken seriously. The return of Soo-Yun (who grew up really quickly in just a few years, from being a little girl to being a teacher!) helps a little, but not enough. This time, the comedic formula doesn't stick very often and the action scenes are also disappointing.
It's just too silly for its own good, that's my issue with it. Even if the film completely recycled stuff that worked in the first two films, I would have been cool with that. But this time, even the execution is off, to the point where the film isn't even that interesting. For curious Rush Hour fans who haven't seen it yet, you may still want to rent it at the local video rental place if you have nothing better to do on a Monday night, but don't cancel dinner reservations to see it.
Middle of the road lameness for middle of the road masses - Review written on February 11, 2008
Rating: 1 out of 5
1 customer found this review helpful.
The Rush Hour series has managed something incredible! Take a once extremely funny comedic actor and the most insane dare devil martial arts actors in the history of cinema and place them in the most watered down boring unexciting snore inducing generic product and you have something that when people get angry and defend it for you mocking it, you are in utter jaw dropping migraine fury that such lame tastes exist. I can't even understand how the mall mega puke-O-plex crowd, however their damaged misguided minds work, would even enjoy this or any other Rush Hour movie. They're so boring, the comedy doesn't register, the action is nothing special, just well, there's far better ways to waste your time. Its a movie, it takes up time and space, but far too bland to be bothered with. I only write this review cause I am looking up better Jackie Chan movies on Amazon and I cannot understand in anyway why Rush Hour had two sequels or any fans. If you absolutely have no idea what makes a good Jackie Chan movie then I will lend you one clue: none of them are made in Hollywood!
Not nice - in several ways - Review written on January 28, 2008
Rating: 1 out of 5
2 customers found this review helpful.
First, I agree with the critics who say there's an element of nastiness in this film. Racism, for example. I'm kinda surprised Chris Tucker let himself be cast this way. He starts out as a traffic cop instead of a detective, against Chan's now being an ambassador's bodyguard. Throughout most of the film, it seems he's the one who makes most of the blunders, and Chan is the one who does most of the bailing out and serious work.
Second, I think the film crosses the line into indecency. It should be R-rated, not PG-13.
This may as well be the last Rush Hour film. I enjoyed 1 and 2, but after seeing this, I'll probably not buy any more, unless I have reason to think there's been a big improvement.
Fans of the series may enjoy, but don't go out of your way for this one... - Review written on January 27, 2008
Rating: 3 out of 5
2 customers found this review helpful.
Fans of the Rush Hour series may (will likely) enjoy this one, but for the most part this is just more of the same action and plot that was in the first two Rush Hour movies.
All too predictable, all too easy to figure out who the good guys are (and who they aren't) long before the movie even really gets going, like the earlier Rush Hour movies the fun for this movie is in watching Jackie Chan's excellent action sequences and in snickering a bit at Chris Tucker's attempts to copy those or toss in a funny line here and there.
I have to ask the studio if they really felt it was necessary to waste a second disc on this, and have to wonder about the idea that Blu-ray has so much room per disc and yet this movie was released on two discs and not one? I suppose it was just a choice by the studio, but I know that Blu-ray discs can easily hold much more content than just the movie, or just the movie and a commentary track and original theatrical trailer.
There are a good many extras available with this release, but those extras aren't on the disc with the movie. In some ways that could be considered a good thing as you might be tempted to watch the movie again instead of simply putting the extras disc in the player and not having to worry about it. It just seems a bit strange that the extras do come on another disc rather than having a single disc with movies, extras and everything on it.
Further confusion comes from the fact that the main feature itself only runs approximately 90 minutes. (In many ways that can be considered a good thing about this movie). At that relatively short length, one would expect there was plenty of left over space on the main disc to have included a lot of the content that was instead put on the second disc. I suppose the trade off would have been that a bunch of content that is on the second disc might have been left out entirely in the name of saving the plastic used for make the second disc. If that was truly the case, then in the words of Emily Latela, "never mind."
Is it worth the purchase? If you can find it discounted go for it. If not, try Unbox and watch it that way (and leave room in your cabinet for sets that are better than this middle of the road quality movie).