Amazon.com Customer Reviews
The spark is gone - Review written on August 31, 2008
Rating: 2 out of 5
I loved the first two films. I was hoping this would be great as well.
And it tries, it really did try. To its credit, there were several very clever scenes. The typical Snow White's gift with animals takes an awesome turn, and I can guarantee that you will never laugh harder at a death scene than the one of this movie. The animation? Top-notch.
I just guess effort doesn't always beat out sheer inspiration. A film with a few moments does not win against a good, simple movie.
The desire to produce a film merely ended up as a plot device to get Shrek and Fiona back to their beloved swamp. A long, boring plot device. With the passing of King Harold, Shrek and Fiona are heirs to the throne of Far, Far Away. Unfortunately, that does not interest them, so Shrek goes on a journey to bring back the next guy, a young Arthur "Artie" Pendragon. Heck, why not? Everyone loves a good Camelot infusion, and Artie is as flawed and as likable as you could want. Unfortunately, he is only one character in a cheesy madhouse of minor characters and cameos. In the effort to get everyone their screen time, that whole plot gets lost in the background.
Which normally wouldn't be a problem. After all, the original movie did not have the most complex of plots. What it had was a few incredible characters. The second movie added a few more, but still kept it delightfully manageable. This time, it seemed that the powers that be assumed we already knew everything about Shrek, Donkey, Puss, and the rest of the bunch that we really didn't need to see them. Hey, let's bring in one more characters for the audience, but refuse to give them time to get to know them! Poor, pathetic lack of character development.
So back to the plot. The few times that came around, it was pretty much a tacky, forced attempt to create some pseudo father/son relationship between Shrek and Artie. Good intentions, but no cigar. Maybe if we had more time... But we don't, so let's just wrap it up with a few corny lines about understanding and rising to the occasion. Yeah, we got that the first time around, and without any of the verbal commentary.
On top of that, this film misses that inexplicable spark of the first two installments. I'm sorry, but I just didn't feel it. Just as a lukewarm attempt of continuing the series and aiming at a five-year old audience.
Sorry. Not my favorite of the series by any means, leaving me to wonder how a sequel to films of such genius as "Shrek" and "Shrek 2" could make something so average?
If you can't get enough of Shrek...., Rent (don't buy) this DVD - Review written on June 20, 2008
Rating: 3 out of 5
You may love the jolly green ogre, and his band of merry donkeys, cats, puppets, gingerbread men, etc.
However what was once fresh, new and innovative, now is bit like day old bread, still edible, but more than a bit stale.
My family and I really wanted to like this movie. We rented it and Ratatouille the same weekend, and guess which was the more memorable of the non-human characters?
The problem is, you get a sense this film was written by a committee of corporate types who rather than deciding to tell a good story, decided to show the world how clever they are. You never connect with this film, as it is gag, after gag, like a bad vaudeville sketch.
In Shrek I and Shrek II you cared about what happened to the characters, this time...., I couldn't care less.
Cheers!
Right up There With Shrek 1 - Review written on June 19, 2008
Rating: 5 out of 5
1 customer found this review not to be helpful.
I loved this movie, and think it's right up there in poignancy and humor with the first film in the trilogy. It was funny as all get-out, had great heart, and although the super animation changed the character's features a bit and the plentiful Special Features were a bit weird, I LOVED this DVD. I'm not a big fan of JT, but I think he did all right in this, and I -adored- the princesses and their roles in this film. ^_^ The goofs, baby advice and yearbook features were the most fun for me, (again though, I thought the yearbook thing was a bit of a stretch since we didn't really explore the school characters -that- much), and I'm so glad to see they've kept up not only the wit, humor and charm of the first movie, but that they've retained its heart as well. ..After all, without both aspects, it just wouldn't be Shrek. ;)
Cheerful Kudos!
RM
a good film--but not great and not as good as the first two were (three and one half stars) - Review written on June 15, 2008
Rating: 4 out of 5
12 customers found this review helpful, 1 did not.
Shrek The Third is a good movie with incredible animation. I marvel at that animation! However, the plot is just average and it didn't really hold my attention the way I hoped it would. I think after this Dreamworks needs to move on to new develop new characters in new films; but only time will tell if Dreamworks wants to milk this theme yet again. The voiceovers are very well done and the DVD has a plethora of extras.
When the action begins, Shrek (Mike Myers) and his wife Princess Fiona (Cameron Diaz) are filling in for the ailing King Harold (John Cleese). Unfortunately, King Harold passes away and, with his dying wish, names Shrek as the rightful heir to the throne. This doesn't sit too well with Shrek who has been suffering from public relations embarrassment to public relations embarrassment as he launches ships with such strength that the ship blows a hole and sinks--and more. King Harold says, just before he dies, that the only other heir to the throne would be a young man at school named Arthur (Justin Timberlake). Immediately after the funeral for King Harold, Shrek, Donkey (Eddie Murphy) and Puss-in-boots (Antonio Banderas) set sail to find Arthur at school. Things go downhill even more when Artie (as Arthur is called) is ambivalent at best to become a king; and it's up to Shrek and his buddies to convince Arthur to become king.
Of course, things back in Far, Far Away Land aren't much better. Prince Charming (Rupert Everett) and his cronies take over the kingdom and imprison Fiona and her friends including Fiona's mother. Things look pretty bleak.
Of course, the plot can go anywhere from here. (Yes, I know, you've read the spoilers by now but I won't give them away anyway.) Will Fiona and the other women be able to break free and fight the evil Prince Charming? How does Shrek react when he finds out he's becoming a father? What happens to Puss-in-boots and Donkey when an old wizard accidentally casts a spell on them so that they are trapped in each other's bodies? Watch the movie and find out!
The DVD extras are very extensive. The commentary is great; and I like the bonus feature that includes a man going through a storyboard of a deleted scene at the school where Arthur is standing on line to get his lunch. There are funny "suggestions" from Donkey, Shrek and other characters as to how to deal with the problems of parenthood; and there are web links as well.
Overall, this is a good effort and a movie to watch when a better one is unavailable. However, Shrek fans will love this movie. This is best suited for families with kids that are at least 8 or 9 years old because of some crude humor that you wouldn't want younger kids to experience.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands. - Review written on June 07, 2008
Rating: 3 out of 5
1 customer found this review helpful.
Shrek the Third begins with the frog king falling ill and the great green ogre and his wife are forced to play interim - clearly a role Shrek doesn't fill comfortable with. Prince Charming then enters the story with a plan that first calls for him to recruit the forgotten members of the fairy tales - though they want as little to do with him as possible. Back to Shrek, who finds out upon the king's death that there is another heir to the thrown - his nephew Artie.
So off Shrek and the gang go to Worcestershire Academy to thrust the crown of Far, Far, Away onto Artie's head. Upon reaching the Academy, Shrek notices a gallant knight riding atop a magnificent steed and believes that Arthur will make a fine king - only to be informed that this gallant knight is Lancelot and they just step on Arthur. So off Shrek and the gang go to persuade Artie. Meanwhile, Prince Charming and crew are off to capture all of Shrek's friends ... including Fiona and her friends ... and lock them in a dungeon.
Shrek finally captures Artie and then crashes his boat - meeting an elder Merlin. Artie convinces Merlin to use his magic to send them back to Far, Far, Away - which he does only to have a slight mix-up with Cat and Donkey. Shortly upon arriving Shrek and the gang are captured by Charming who ends up letting Artie go. Time for women's lib to come to Far, Far, Away - If the real thing dont do the trick You better make up something quick You gonna burn burn burn burn it to the wick
Ooooooh, barracuda?
I'll leave it there, but Shrek the Third has all the characters you love, plus some new additions. After three full-length films, the charm has simply faded away from the series, but most will enjoy this movie. If you missed the other films in the series I'll list them below:
Shrek
Shrek 2
Shrek the Third - Review written on April 20, 2008
Rating: 3 out of 5
2 customers found this review helpful, 1 did not.
Well, this is not a bad movie, not a great movie, so I always found those reviews hardest to write. It is basically the same movie we've seen before, but this time without the originality. The only major difference now is that it is in 3D, which I've come to enjoy after Beowulf. It's the same old story, the ogre Shrek, is now filling in as king in Far, Far Away, since his father-in-law is dying. So, with Fiona pregnant for the first time, he goes off to find the only remaining heir to the throne except him, Arthur (a.k.a Artie), so he can move back to the swamp with his wife and leave the throne to Artie. Of course, he enlists the aid of Donkey (played by Eddie Murphy, as usual) and Pus, played by Banderas. Eddie Murphy is simply hilarious in this trilogy, being perfect in his role as the stupid, nagging but goodhearted donkey.
Apart from that there's not really much to say about it, it contains a lot of references to fairytales, European culture, myth and "modern popular culture". Quite amusing at times, but I wonder who this film really is marketed towards. Is it children or is it adults? The children won't get the jokes, and I suspect they would find this movie quite boring. But all in all, if you have enjoyed the other two, you'll enjoy this one as well, only not so much as before.
3,5 stars.
"Where Did The Magic Go?" - Review written on February 20, 2008
Rating: 3 out of 5
1 customer found this review helpful.
Shrek turned out to be a an unexpected hit when it was released in 2001 and expanding on the succes of the first one Dreamworks studio ultimatly made a sequel,the simply titled Shrek 2 wich was not only better at the box office than the previous but also better as a movie.Shrek The Third,the second sequel is somewhat lacking what the previous two movies in the franchise had,orginality.Yet it stills manages to keep young and old fans satisfied,as there is still plenty of the same humor that made the other Shrek films so good.I was pretty sure they could never top Shrek 2 and this third movie didn't.The plot and humor sadly aren't as good as they could and should have been,even if some parts are funny like Pinocchio and Gingerbread Man's parts.
The plot for this third movie in the Shrek series,is with the death of Fiona's father King Harold,the king of Far Far Away,Shrek becomes the next king.The thing is he doesn't accept that responsability so he goes on quest to recruit the perfect king.His choice settles on a young boy named Arthur but before he can bring him to his throne,Far Far Away is being invaded by Prince Charming who beleves HE must be king and an army of villains.The execution of the script to the big screen was rather average,nothing really special except a thing or two that was funny but i think that after this rather disapointing third movie Shrek has miles ahead if they want to recover their former glory.For Dreamworks its pretty much "Well,as long as it gets us cash" situation but they should pay closer attention to Shrek 4 cause if that one turns out like the third things are going to get bad.
The visuals are one thing that they have actually done better than Shrek 1 and 2.They look stunning for a 3D movie and can only get better in future Shrek movies,its good that they stuck with the same kind of visuals as well.Still i can't deny that i was disapointed when i walked out of the Movie Theather,it just wasn't the same thing than with the first two.Those where magical,histerical movies,filled with great moments that i still remember today.With this third instalment of the series i can't say it sucked but i can't say it was that great either.
That said its still satisfying but just not up to par with the first two films in terms of appreciation.The soundtrack remains great as the others with some classic and new songs,notably Led Zeppelin's classic "Immigrant Song" wich was played during a part of the movie's commercial.Its nice that despite everything they still have the orginal voice actors after all that time.Have anyone else noticed how the camera is less on Shrek,Donkey and Puss than in previous movies?It also seems to be aimed at a younger audience than the first two,its more fart jokes and such.As a mature person i would have to stick with my rating and opinion and give it a three,if it is rated for a kid movie then it would get a five,if you have kids by all means buy it for them they will have a great time.Lets hope for the next Shrek movies they turn out better than "Shrek The Third".