Amazon.com Customer Reviews
When Are Viewers Going To Understand? This IS A Magnificant, Must See, True "Reality" Show! - Review written on June 07, 2008
Rating: 5 out of 5
2 customers found this review helpful, 1 did not.
"Lord of War" is a wake up call for all people; it is a movie that emotionally effects the viewer and spotlights the reality of war that the mass media, educational systems, and social structure do not want you to understand. The first time I viewed this movie I found myself in complete disbelief that Hollywood had actually been able to release this film, because it is the ultimate "Reality" show: so truthful it is scary. In fact, without the cynical, often gut-wrenching, humor, the film would be "too real" to consider "entertainment." I believe that it is this "ultra realism" that has lead to reviews that are, as stated by another reviewer, NAIVE--or cynical at best. That there are more reviews with four or fewer stars attests to the inability/refusal of viewers to pay attention to what they are watching. "Lord of War" is definitely not pure, unabashed indulgence of one's senses, but a film that requires listening and watching--engaging the film; not passing the time.
As a former Combat Engineer Officer who was "courted" more than a few times by "gun buyers" and mercenaries--no I never got involved--I can assure you, like Robert D. Steele in his review, I have seen it all; and to the degree that I was ordered to abandon and bury weapons, ammunitions, and other military equipment, I was an unwilling participant in bringing war to others.
The script is superb; the acting is so seamless, that it is easy to see how other reviewers describe the acting as something short of completely poor performances. Again, Robert D. Steele puts it most succinctly: "This is a first rate movie with some truly extraordinary visuals and some truly extraordinary lines." It is unfortunate that politics, personal beliefs, and a general lack of interest in understanding the world we live in must overwhelm potential viewer's interest, and thereby distract or prevent them from viewing, such a distinctly unique and powerful movie as "Lord of War." When you watch the film, instead of thinking there is no way it could happen, stop and ask yourself: If this is really happening, what does it mean to me, my family, and my friends--not to mention nation? Then look at the research and the facts out there, and you will see that "Lord of War" is truly entertainment (at its' best) imitating reality; that "Lord of War" is a movie you can watch over and over as a reality check that entertains and engages you, the viewer.
Additionally, the 2-Disc Special Edition provides documentary follow-up to the statements and information made in the movie. While these features were not "news" to me, they have proven very beneficial for helping others who view the film as "too far fetched to be true," despite their keen awareness of my past and knowledge of such events. They definitely add to the credibility of the movie for many. So, hopefully, more people will be encouraged to venture into true "reality," and view this film--either for the first time, or with a "new" understanding of what the "Lord of War" is about.
Update--1 July 2008: If this review was not helpful to you, I would appreciate learning the reason(s) so I can improve my reviews. My goal is to provide help to potential buyers, not get into any arguments. So, if you only disagree with my opinion, could you please say so in the comments and not indicate that the review was not helpful. Thanks.
When Will Hollywood Make Good Movies Again? - Review written on April 19, 2008
Rating: 2 out of 5
1 customer found this review helpful, 3 did not.
Nick Cage's 2006 drama "Lord of War" collapses into oblivion the notion that contemporary Hollywood makes interesting movies. Although Cage gives this plot-less dud an admirable (sometimes funny-sometimes serious) performance. This anti-gun movie trips over itself to become anti-movie movie.
In almost everyway this movie misses the mark trying to make a point. There are so many poignant opportunities but, alas, all are ignored. The producers simply didn't get an idea. Also, there is hardly anything original with "Lord of War" (same old guns are bad clichés, the usual Africa is only a place of war and AIDs, and the typical American laws and authorities must be ignored for good to prevail, blah, blah, blah...). Is Cage really this anti-American?
Everyone knows arms dealing is bad, so why not address issues that will help to end it? This movie doesn't say anything except that the evil United States is the world's largest arms merchant. One is left to wonder, because a plot doesn't ensue to bring home any point, "so what?"
It seems that the American motion picture industry has lost it way. Too bad, there are a huge variety of original opportunities for screenplays. People want to go to the movies. But, with odd flicks like this one emerging, there's no theater-going incentive.
Don't bother with "Lord of War"... Cage is much better in his other recent work (National Treasure 1 & 2, etc). Someone tell me, when will Hollywood make good movies again?
Just like "Blow", but with guns - Review written on April 08, 2008
Rating: 4 out of 5
Five minutes into "Lord of War" I realized that I had seen this film before, except it starred Johnny Depp, and was about cocaine trafficking and was called "Blow". Yeah, there are a lot of similarities between "Lord of War" and "Blow", both plot-wise and in the style of the films.
"Lord of War" tells the story of Yuri Orlov (Nicolas Cage), a Ukrainian-American arms dealer, who brags about having sold guns to every army on Earth except for the Salvation Army. Although Orlov is a fictional character, the script is based on actual events and is so well researched that it is completely believable to the point of being scary. Orlov is a completely immoral character who is unashamed of what he is doing and the idea that people like him could actually exist is genuinely frightening.
From an entertainment point of view, "Lord of War" is not a fun film. The first half of the film, which details the rise of Yuri Orlov and his arms deals in assorted Eastern European countries is enjoyable enough, but I found the second half, in which Orlov moves into the war-ravaged African countries, to be depressing. The film is redeemed by an ending which I liked very much, but because of the scenes set in Africa, I probably won't be watching this film again in a hurry.
Nevertheless, Nicolas Cage is excellent in this film. Initially, I felt that he was just playing the same character that he has played in every other film, but Cage's portrayal of Orlov as a man whose soul has been totally destroyed by his actions, at the end of the film, is still haunting me as I write this. Overall, I preferred "Lord of War" to "Blow" because, unlike in "Blow", the makers of "Lord of War" weren't afraid to show Orlov for who he really is, a soulless man responsible for the deaths of millions.
Men With Golden Guns - Review written on April 02, 2008
Rating: 4 out of 5
The Good Things
*Complex, all-encompassing story that's thrilling and interesting throughout.
*Very strong, thought-provoking themes (especially concerning the moral implications of gun trafficking, the corruptive nature of crime, world governments' role in worldwide violence, and many other eye-opening topics).
*Lots of memorable scenes and imagery that reinforce the various themes. Good filming style.
*Excellent characters. Nicholas Cage provides both witty humor and bleak moral commentary.
*Some parts are exceptionally detailed and realistic; it is clear that the filmmakers did their research. Good writing.
*Good sound and music design.
The Bad Things
*Some themes really are convoluted, especially regarding the main character. Even though he looses everything, he never really suffers any legal punishment and never learns from his mistakes, and continues to smuggle guns.
*Not sure if the film is really politically or socially accurate.
I could summarize this as "Scarface" with guns instead of drugs, but such a comparison is really too simple. Although Yuri (Nicholas Cage) has many of the same traits as Tonny Montanna, he is a very different character, full of wit and wisdom that contrasts with his lack of morality. This film also differentiates itself with vivid settings (both physical and political), a strong filming style, and some very revealing themes. This film portrays many of the problems in developing countries, and explores the issues surrounding them. By the end of it, it leaves you bleakly pondering about the world's situation. I would definately reccomend to everybody to at least rent this movie.
How can such a bleak situation be so entertaining? - Review written on March 30, 2008
Rating: 4 out of 5
1 customer found this review helpful.
"Lord of War" follows the story of a young immigrant who becomes a dealer in a shady business, rises to the top and eventually faces tragedy and loss. Sound Familiar?
Comparisons to "Scarface," in which a Cuban immigrant gains prominence as a drug lord, are not far off the mark. "Traffic" is another obvious influence. "Lord of War" also takes us deep into a business where money takes precedence over morals.
Nicolas Cage is Yuri Orlov, a Ukrainian immigrant raised in Brooklyn. After witnessing a shooting, he decides that guns are his calling. With help from his troubled brother, Vitaly (excellently played by Jared Leto), he eventually surpasses international arms dealers who shrugged him off as an "amateur" only years before. He puts it best when he says, "I sold to every army but the Salvation Army."
Cage's performance is great and drives home the fact that Yuri is just a man doing his job, and what his buyers do with his product is none of his business. He's collected and professional on the outside, but it seems that he knows what he's doing is immoral. He basically ignores that thought and continues fulfilling his purpose, although he witness events that can only occur because of people like him, such as village massacres in Africa and the use of child soldiers (since an AK-47 is so easy to use that a child can handle it).
Cage portrays a man who enjoys what he does, even if he is full of inner turbulence because of his occupation. He grows weary by the end of the 20 year period in which the movie is set, yet he's come too far to stop. Pleas from his trophy wife, Ava (Bridget Maynahan), and Vitaly do no good in the long run. Yuri becomes a lost cause, and an arrogant one at that. It's necessary to go into such detail about Yuri, since he's such a complex and charismatic character who carries the film along much of the time.
The movie is rather dark, with humor that may cause a nervous chuckle instead of uncontrollable laugher. It's more of a satire than a comedy, as some people seem to label it. Rebellions are seen as business opportunities while peace agreements are viewed as obstacles. Yuri cheers and kisses Mikhail Gorbachev's head on his television at the fall of the Berlin Wall, which opened the floodgates in the Third World black arms market. Interpol officer Jack Valentine (Ethan Hawke) catches Yuri transporting his merchandise several times, but no one is arrested because of a loophole, technicality or obvious cover up. The U.S. president is called the biggest arms dealer of them all and potshots are taken at democracy. This list goes on.
"Lord of War" paints a bleak and cynical view of the world. Yuri sums up the theme of the movie when he says, "They say evil prevails when good men fail to act. What they ought to say is that evil prevails."
There are times when the movie falters. It takes awhile to really get going and sometimes the characters seem a little too upbeat, given their circumstances. Despite any minor shortcomings, the movie is still intriguing, entertaining, thought-provoking, moving, and borderline brilliant at times. The strong performances and plot, plus a unique style, make "Lord of War" one of the better movies of 2005.
Highly recommended.
cynical, deadly, evil, and pathetic - Review written on March 19, 2008
Rating: 3 out of 5
This is a pretty good film about a man who self-actualizes the corruption that is in the deepest part of his soul as a black market arms dealer. Cage narrates this life - out only for himself, regardless of who he helps to kill - and it is effective to a degree. We witness his rise, his many ruses to avoid prison or execution, and its repercussions on his personal life. I admit, Cage's dark humor and splendidly indifferent tone are at times funny and affecting. But the best characterizations, I think, are in the people he encounters, from the cold rival arms dealer he fights to the brutal African thug who makes him rich. It is very good acting.
Nonetheless, this is Hollywood trying to display some social conscience. There is a kind of breathlessness to it, like they are revealing something to the audience, almost as reporting, but I found its sincerity rather naive. While it is good to expose audiences to this, I suppose, the tone of the film implies that none of us know about these kinds of people already. (I, for one, have been following the issue since 1982, when I read The Global Politics of Arms Sales, by Andrew Pierre, which is a great academic masterwork, or Anthony Sampson's reporting on it from the early 1980s.)
There is no way you can say airing these issues is bad. Recommended for those who haven't follwed the issue of international arms trafficing.
A sobering look at the world of gun running - Review written on November 11, 2007
Rating: 4 out of 5
The world is a dangerous place. It always has been, it always will be. Even here, in the west, with all our so called civilization and culture, it's still unsafe to walk the streets.
Take any major city, even my hometown of Calgary. There is crime. Petty crime, white collar crime, so called `victimless' crime, and of course, the daddy of them all - violent crime.
Canada prides itself in being low on the totem pole of violent crime involving firearms. But the fact remains thus - no matter where you are, there will always be a need for guns. The criminals will always be able to get guns, no matter what the police and the government tries do to about it.
In the states, and correct me if I'm wrong, but it's been said that there are more gun-shops than there are McDonalds.
The same can't be said about Canada. We've got strict rules governing weapons here in Canada. You have to apply for a F.A.C. or Firearms Acquisition Certificate. This involves a background check and other safety measures.
You even have to proof you have successfully completed a firearms safety training course or test, or have been certified as competent to use a firearm.
Pretty amazing, isn't it? What's even more amazing is, despite these strict rules, what kinds of weapons can be brought into the country. I recall reading the Calgary Sun earlier this week and looking at the picture of the weapons seized. There was an assault rifle with a GRENADE LAUNCHER!
A Grenade Launcher!
It's pretty damn clear that even in Canada, if you want a weapon, you can get it. And yet
If you're willing to pay the fees.
You can get your weapons from the criminal element, or from Gunrunners.
I guess you could almost take Lord of War to be a biography, a life story of one particular Gun runner named Yuri Orlov, a Ukrainian Immigrant to the states.
He started out his career as most criminals do. He started small. But as time passed and he gained experience, he went from being a small time runner to one who had ties in very high places, and buyers world-wide.
Although like a drug dealer, he followed a simple rule. Don't use what you sell. It served him well. Keep yourself separated from your clients. Don't get involved except to seal the deal.
Can you, however, stay neutral? Can you deal in weapons of death and destruction without feeling the ramifications, one way or another?
Can you ever get out? Can you have a chance at ever going legit?
And, the biggest question. Can you deal with the consequences of your actions? Can you sew what you've reaped, even if you've tried to stay at arms length?
Lord of War doesn't glorify Gun-runners. It doesn't show it as a glamorous lifestyle, even if the money is good.
It shows you what they deal in, and what it's used for. One man's freedom fighter is another man's terrorist. A Hero to the people on one side, a practitioner of genocide to another.
This movie isn't sugar coated, nor does it shy away from violence.
As per usual, Nicholas Cage does a fine job of portraying a smart and resourceful criminal. And let's not forget that, he is a criminal in this movie.
One last note... as with anything, we here in North America should never take for granted what we have. Sure, there is crime, there is hunger and homelessness, but when you consider what it's like in other countries, especially the Middle East and Africa, and even parts of Europe and Asia, we've got it lucky.
After all, we could live in these countries where `Lords of War' earn their daily bread.
4 out of 5
Good look at arms dealing; Cage almost there as usual - Review written on October 08, 2007
Rating: 4 out of 5
1 customer found this review helpful.
I liked this on the whole; when the script is good and the director wrote it, things often turn out well. LOW tries to be balanced and not too preachy; the rationalizations actually make some sense. The film downplays the political connections more than is likely true, though, I'd guess (destabilization of third world countries is one of the CIA's favorite tactics, as revealed by many ex-agents in many books, as is the Agency's drug-dealing as a method of both "insurgent" funding and arms trading, as revealed in the Iran/Contra hearings).
My main qualm is with Cage, who somehow always seems to invest his characters with less brains and savvy than they deserve. It worked great in Raising Arizona but is wearing thin since then. He's kind of like the unthinking man's James Caan. Cage comes so close sometimes, but I just can't buy him all the way. Here he is solid but never transcends and takes this movie to the next level.
Leto is good, as are most of the bit players, especially some of the Africans, who have more presence than some of the stars.
LOW does get pretty violent. The violence rarely seems gratuitous, though, so its point gets made.
Worth seeing.
A Stylish Look At Arms Dealing - Review written on September 05, 2007
Rating: 4 out of 5
2 customers found this review helpful.
This was a very pleasant surprise, far better than I had ever hoped, filled with fabulous cinematography and riveting story about the life of arms dealer during the 1980s and '90s.. Those who appreciate an interesting story and great visuals will like this one.
Nicholas Cage was terrific as the lead character, "Yuri Orlov." I loved his narration, too. How much of what he said is true, I have no idea, but it's fascinating stuff.
I felt those visuals, combined with the outstanding acting and always-interesting story made this a good film. It also proved you don't need action every two minutes to keep a film involving for the audience. This has just the right amount of drama, suspense, action, romance and, yes, even humor.
I do have to warn some that the message is a pessimistic one: that evil always wins in the world. According to Bible of "Yuri," in the end, the meek won't inherit the earth; the arms dealers will and that evil rules, so why fight it and yourself over it? Wow, what uplifting words to live by.
Outside of Yuri's wife "Ava" (Bridget Moynahan) and the man who pursues him, "Jack Valentine" (Ethan Hawke) no one in here has much in the way of high-ground morals. At least they made the lawman an honest; that's rare in films today.
Amir Mokri is the cinematographer and Andrew Niccol, the director, who combined to make this movie look so stylish and beautiful to see. Looking at Mokri's resume, I see he's done a number of stylish films. Niccol hasn't directed much but what he has also offers interesting visuals.
Looking at the front and back cover of the DVD might make you think this is just another of these brainless action flicks, but it is not. This is solid film, despite the pessimism.