Amazon.com Customer Reviews
POLAR EXPRESS COULD HAVE BEEN WARMER - Review written on November 30, 2008
Rating: 3 out of 5
1 customer found this review helpful.
I had read that this movie cost 160 million to make, and the special effects are amazing at times, but I really could not get into the weird digital animation, it was like the characters were alien, I could not really connect with any of the leads, especially the main character, he seemed so void of emotion and otherworldly, I mean could they have at least made their eyes not so dead? On some level the film is quite beautiful, and I appreciate the enormous amount of work it took to get this film to look this way..I realize Zemikis was trying to give the movie the look of the books amazing illustrations and again on one level it works, but it sort of takes all the feeling out of the movie, I never really felt vested in the outcome of this kids trip, and the beginning of the movie, with the hobo on the top of the train was not only bizarre but more than a little spooky and i never really got his revelevance, he was never properly explained. Hanks voices several character and he is alright i guess, but frankly they could have saved the money on his salary and gotten some unknown, I mean who really cared if Hanks was the voice? I hope he at least did this thing for scale, but im doubting it. I did like how the setting was the 50's, it added to the nastalgia and the CGI North Pole was fantastic, but the story waxed and wained and took a long time to get going, all and all hardly "A Christmas Story".
I don't know what all the criticism is about... - Review written on November 26, 2008
Rating: 4 out of 5
4 customers found this review helpful.
...I played this on my laptop (media player wouldn't play it due to some licensing issue--had to use my other DVD software) and the 3D worked very well for me. But that is always a rule of thumb for anaglyph (red/blue or red/green) 3D: The better the screen is at holding true colors, the better the 3D effect will be. My older tube-type television never pulled off 3D very well, so I haven't even bothered trying it there, but I was surprised to see so many with hi-def TVs complaining about the 3D effect as well.
The box contains an insert that tells you to watch in a darkened room. This is good advice, because it is difficult for some people to let their mind go as far as 3D when there are objects (i.e. the TV itself!) that will make them forget they are seeing 3D...with no point of reference around the screen, the 3D tends to work better. The insert also tells you to make sure there is no glare on the TV screen--more good advice because that glare always tells you exactly where the screen is spatially and will ruin the 3D effect.
Finally, the insert tells you to up the brightness on your TV. I am not sure if this ever helps. Personally, when trying to adjust a TV for 3D viewing, I try to pick a scene with wide separation between the red/blue image (i.e., when something is up close/off the screen) and adjust the tint, brightness, and contrast so that I minimize the double image when viewing with only one eye open through either the red or blue lenses...when looking through only one lens, you should only see one image...the trick is to find a compromise that reduces as much as possible the ghosting seen in each eye.
As for people complaining about this release not using the gray lenses....as someone else already explained, it isn't possible to use that format on home television screens. Anaglyph is the only mainstream home theater method for separating the two viewpoints needed for 3D to work.
If you tried this unsuccessfully on your TV, try it on a computer monitor to see if the 3d works better there.
Anyway, that's my 2-cents...I hate to see the complaints about 3D presentations, as it tends to discourage the studios from releasing 3D DVDS and they DO WORK for me. I only gave this 4 stars, as I would have rated it a 5 had they included or made available separately a field-sequential 3D version, which is far superior to the red/blue anaglyph format for pure off-the-screen effects in home theater.
Polar Express 3D Blu-ray not IMAX quality - Review written on November 03, 2008
Rating: 3 out of 5
10 customers found this review helpful.
This is a great holiday film. I saw the original 3D at the IMAX theater and it was stunning to say the least. I did have my hopes high for this Blu-ray release. After all, Blu-ray is high quality and with an HD TV, it has to be good, correct? Well, the quality is not nearly as good as the IMAX showing. It's not perfectly aligned while watching it. The color is somewhat subtle because of the Red/Cyan glasses and how it is viewed. If you do buy this 3D copy, the disc also has the regular 2D film on it. I wasn't impressed at all, but with all of that said, I do feel people will still enjoy it. It does show some depth, but if you loved IMAX, don't expect the same effect here.
3D Blu Ray - Not as I had hoped - Review written on November 01, 2008
Rating: 3 out of 5
3 customers found this review helpful.
Haven't watched the entire movie yet in 3D, but from the few minutes that I have watched, the 3D quality is not what I had expected. One would think that after decades of motion picture improvements, that 3D technology would be included in all recent releases. For instance, I have viewed just a few minutes of Journey to the Center of the Earth in 3D and I also had the pleasure of seeing it also on the big screen in 3D. What a marvel. Two huge thumbs up for Journey in 3D. However, I cannot say any thumbs up for Polar Express. If you watch the extras from the standard featurettes, you could see there was an awful lot of hard work to put this motion picture together. However, when you see the actual 3D version of this movie, one's expectations is greatly reduced. So if you have a high quality set of 3D glasses that is configured for the distortion of the 3D affect of the picture, then I would suggest watching the 2D version. This way, you can still enjoy the movie and not be disappointed.
Here's what I was able to see during the first few minutes of viewing the 3D version. First, the depth of the imagery wasn't as displaced with using the issued 3D glasses that also shipped with the package. During the movies, one could see the over shot of "Red" beamed off to the left of the objects centered. Meaning you STILL got a blur when viewing the movies using the "CHEAPLY" made 3D glasses that was shipped with the DVD. IF you must experiment with the 3D version, recommend buying a higher quality version of the 3D glasses. I plan to buy a higher quality 3D glasses that are configured for this DVD. BTW, the 3D glasses that come in the Journey to the Center of the Earth movies is not compatible with Polar Express 3D. And if you kept the 3D glasses that you watched JTCE from the big screen, they don't work either. So with this being said, I give the 3D version a big fat 3 stars. Only because there is a little bit of 3D affect and the quality of the story itself rates a star, but nothing more than that.
A message to the film makers. If you are going to support the high expectations of your audiences, then spend a nickel to buy better quality 3D glasses that can better support your movies in 3D.
A message to the general public. Anyone got a decent pair of 3D glasses they want to sell?
Ya'll have a good one!
Avoid the 3D Version! - Review written on October 30, 2008
Rating: 1 out of 5
5 customers found this review helpful.
I am so glad I got this movie early (before the holidays) and found out when I did how horrible the 3D version of the DVD itself is. Thank goodness there is a regular DVD of the movie included as well, but I already have that, so back it goes. I hope Warner has to foot the bill for this rip-off.
The movie itself concerns an older boy who no longer believes in Santa Claus. A late night train ride to the North Pole, where time stops at five minutes to midnight on Christmas Eve, convinves him otherwise. I would rate the movie itself a 5-star, one that has already become a holiday tradition.
However, in the home 3D version, the colors are faded, the lines blurry. I checked the glasses, the disc and my tv, all with no luck in improving the picture. What a shame. I've watched other 3D movies at home with similar cheap glasses, and it looked fine. As many others have written, if you're expecting an IMAX experience at home, forget it. (I have a flat screen tube HDTV.)
Imperfect but worth it - Review written on October 30, 2008
Rating: 4 out of 5
3 customers found this review helpful.
I'm speaking from the point of view that we all already know the movie/story itself (even without 3D) is wonderful. It has become a holiday treasure even for me, and I am a die-hard fan of the holiday specials from the 60's and 70's (with the one exception of "A Christmas Story" which came out in the 80's). That being said:
LET'S NOT EXPECT AN IMAX 3D EXPERIENCE HERE, PEOPLE!!! LOL
This DVD comes with 4 of those old-timey glasses that have blue on one eye and red on the other. The 3D effects are fair to middling to decent, definitely adding to the experience for me, and I'm just watching it on a small 13" laptop so far.
What is especially nice is you get the non-3D version (in widescreen) on a separate disk in this case, so if you don't already have it, you're getting two for the price of one.
I'm curious to see how other folks experience this product - perhaps on larger screens, flat screens, etc., the effects might be better.
I saw it last year at IMAX in 3D and there is just no way to duplicate that on a home system. Considering the comparatively crude electronics most people have, this 3D version is pretty good.
Please note that they include viewing tips which consists of recommendations that you watch this in a dark room (with no glare on screen) with your screen settings very bright in order to get best results.
The Polar Express, Blu-ray, 3-D ("A Mixed Bag of Gifts") - Review written on October 29, 2008
Rating: 4 out of 5
5 customers found this review helpful, 2 did not.
Well, it appears that this will be the first review of the Blu-ray, 3-D version of this movie on Amazon...I'm honored! I won't waste your time with yet another boring opinion of the story or characters themselves, as there are already hundreds of those on here for you to spend all day reading! Along those lines, I will ONLY say that I personally love this movie and honestly believe it's the best, most realistic, and heartfelt use of animation technology that I've ever seen. I'm over 50 and have seen most all of them by now.
ANYWAY, I am ONLY going to comment on my take of the 3-D video quality here, and leave the (great) audio quality to others, as my curiosity regarding the 3-D feature was why I upgraded from my perfectly good HD DVD copy. I bought this edition yesterday (on release date) and watched the whole movie in 3-D last night, on our 60-inch Sony HD, 1080i, rear projection screen. I put the supplied blue and red cardboard glasses over my regular eyeglasses. Not super-comfortable, if you have an adult-sized head and need to wear normal eyeglasses. You'll eventually get all of your eyewear lined up...what else could you do?!! (I think you can buy sturdier, more comfortable ones online somewhere).
HERE IS THE GOOD: I don't have much to compare this to (perhaps others do), except something I'll mention later, but YES, I was blown away by the almost constant use of the 3-D technology. Snow seemed to be falling all over my home theater room (sometimes turning the whole room into a snow globe, if you catch my "drift"...pun intended!!...sorry, I couldn't resist!) Other objects, food, and hot chocolate flew or bounced around the train cars and past my head, front to rear!! Just about everything, even when subtle, seemed to pop off (or extend in front of) the screen! I think our 60-inch, large screen added to the desired effect, since I imagine that life-sized people and objects will seem more real, coming at or past you. I don't think a much smaller screen would create quite as much of a dramatic effect, but I'd be curious to hear about that...maybe everything is proportionately equal that way? So, the 3-D is very cool! As I mentioned earlier, the only better 3-D effect I've ever seen (and I've never seen IMAX), was at Disney World (about 20 years ago!), when they were showing some sort of Michael Jackson island adventure short ("Captain...something or other!!"), made especially for that venue. That one was absolutely AMAZING, when creatures actually "flew" off the screen and "perched" on top of nearby audience seats, then flew around the audience, taunting everybody!...No, I wasn't drinking!!! And swords, knives, or spears were thrown at the audience from the screen, as well! It was really a bit scary, actually, and I wasn't a little kid then either! And just think, that was all those years ago, technologically speaking. Who knows what can truly be done today?
ANYWAY, HERE IS THE BAD: Even on Blu-ray (and I wouldn't suggest that you even bother with the standard def 3-D version because of this), you will lose about HALF of the clarity and I'd say about 2/3 of the color, compared with the 2-D version. Everything looks almost, but not quite, Black & White, with a metallic-looking tint effect that often matches the colors on the supplied lenses. Also, it even tells you somewhere to turn up your brighness and/or "vivid" setting on your screen, because the picture is noticeably DARKER than the regular version. This gives an interesting eerie effect, but not really what most viewers (and their kids) would probably expect or want.
When you combine the drawbacks with the somewhat uncomfortable glasses (despite the "cool" Fifties-style fashion look!!!), I think you'll agree with my BOTTOM LINE CONCLUSION: It's a must-see for people who love this movie, as I do, just to experience it if nothing else. BUT...my future viewings will mostly be in 2-D, with the beautiful Blu-ray picture quality, with its usual clarity, color, brightness, etc. It will of course be a great "Demo Disc" to show off your system (again, preferably with a large screen if you want it to look real wintery in your house!!).
ALL IN ALL...a good addtion to your Blu-ray collection and a GREAT CONVERSATION PIECE!!! PS: My wife loved it, and she isn't the technology addict that I can sometimes be! I hope this helps...Enjoy!
Buyer beware - Review written on October 28, 2008
Rating: 1 out of 5
3 customers found this review helpful, 3 did not.
For those of us that fell in love with "The Polar Express" when it came out in 3D in theaters, this is the biggest slap in the face that Warner's could sell us. I have been anticipating this home 3D version since it was announced and snatched it up only to have my excitement crushed when I discovered that the 3D was done with the old fashioned "red/blue" glasses and not the grey lenses currently in theaters. Why would they do this? First off, the dual color lenses ruins the color saturation of any film. Second, the technology is out there! With Blue Ray, HDTVs, DLP projectors and such, the replication of a true home multiplex is in our grasp. The film has already been processed to use the grey lenses. Why spend the money to reprocess the film into red and blue separation? This makes no sense. When I discovered this deception, I immediately opened the packages at the counter and promptly returned them. (The same applies to "Journey to the Center of the Earth". It has the colored lenses too.) Do not waste your money on a sub-standard 3D experience.
UPDATE: While I understand another reviewer's tale of the polarized light 3D, I don't believe that the "Disney Digital 3D" that I saw "Monster House" or the theaters that showed "Beowulf" or "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix" bought special projectors just to feature these films. My original IMAX experience used "shutter" type goggles that looked like diving gear and I could see that point. But my last few experiences, from "The Nightmare Before Christmas" through "Meet the Robinsons", have been "Blues Brothers" type glasses that I was able to keep. My belief is that the technology is out there and someone at the head office just thought this was cheaper to produce.
OK. Is it or is it not, in 3D? - Review written on October 25, 2008
Rating: 4 out of 5
3 customers found this review helpful, 1 did not.
I saw the movie in an IMAX theatre and enjoyed it a great deal. I'm a 60 year old man who watched the House of Wax, Charge at Feather River, Hondo, etc., in 3D when they first were released, in the 1950s. I love the process and am happy that more movies are getting duplicated in 3D for the big screen...and the little ones too.
The description, for both the standard and Blu-Ray version, states: "The version of the film on DVD is the standard theatrical version, not the 3-D version seen in IMAX theaters. --David Horiuchi"
The term "3D" is set out, on the DVD box, in larger font than the name of the movie, but Amazon includes the claim that it's a flat version, and nowhere refers to it as "including glasses" as it does for "Journey to the Center of the Earth."
I'm not buying until I know...but, it is a really good movie.