Amazon.com Customer Reviews
Underlying assumptions - Review written on September 05, 2008
Rating: 3 out of 5
6 customers found this review helpful, 1 did not.
This is an interesting book with some insights to offer. Though these ideas are not earth-shattering or new, the presentation is novel, increasing the chance that some of the simple and clearly true advice offered may actually sink in. On the other hand, the authors have some underlying moral assumptions which they themselves may not realize are dubious, and which color their work,
This is what I mean: First, as to their insights, the authors demonstrate how wealth is acquired and maintained by the people who actually accumulate it, millionaires and/or those people who retain and build on a sufficient portion of what they earn to become financially independent. They define this as an ability to continue indefinitely in their current or similar lifestyle, without any additional earnings.
Theses people have certain traits and choices in common- a lot of which would be admirable without reference to money- such as doing what they think is appropriate and sensible, rather than what their neighbors do and admire. They drive used cars, instead of wasteful new vehicles, spend on education for their children, rather than fancy clothes, etc.
Perhaps most importantly, from a financial perspective, they live at or below their means, and save and invest a substantial portion of their income. In a time when our personal and national debt has come home to roost, this can seem like utter genius. Sure, we all know it, but as a group, we seem to have been entirely unable to execute this feat. If you want to know how to plant a garden, ask the guy who has long maintained a beautiful garden himself, otherwise, ask his gardener- not the person with a scabby yard full of weeds- even if he has a degree in horticulture. Probably.
We live in a fantasy world, fueled by the unrealistic media image of the lifestyles of ordinary people- who are waitresses and aspiring actors (eg "Friends"), yet share spacious New York apartments that a merchant banker could barely afford. Advertisements of credit card companies tell us that these and other acquired luxury goodies are what we deserve, and offer them to us in exchange for signing over our futures to indentured debt servitude.
I buy much of this advice, especially the part about not spending more than I earn, and hope to win the struggle to avoid debt and save and invest enough to retire without living on dogfood. It is an interesting presentation, done via tons of data about what wealthy people actually do. Despite being dated statisically, this evidence makes the author's points convincingly; I'd bet that further data collection would be consistent with their first 2 efforts.
I do, however, see a fundamental flaw in the authors' value system. They so admire their exemplary subjects for their courage and common sense that they are utterly uncritical of their priorities. The accumulation of wealth to the extent of leaving an estate behind at death is the virtue, while all spending of earnings beyond that necessary for a modestly comfortable life (with the possible exception of certain charitable contributions) is presumed to be in aid of a pretentious and contemptible seeking of status and/or empty, transient amusements.
Phooey. The authors themselves admit that subsidized children of the wealthy are crippled by an inability to imagine a less luxurious lifestyle than that provided for them- so what's the point of having more than you need to retire fearlessly, if you want to, or if it becomes necessary? Money in a big pile for when you die- or as an abstract measure of your accomplishnent or worth-is useless and, dare I say it- greedy.
Money spent on education for its own sake, making or supporting art and the environment, travel, research, and other life enriching activities should not be viewed as status seeking, useless behaviour; it is money well spent. A life boiled down to economic survival is a desperate existence, and if we are lucky enough, and disciplined enough to be able to provide for own financial survival, in my world view, it is a waste and a sin to ignore all of opportunities for a life that is so much more.
Rich message, poor delivery - Review written on August 17, 2008
Rating: 2 out of 5
4 customers found this review helpful.
Don't get me wrong, this book is founded on smart advice. Its main morals are the following:
- Don't believe what you see in the media; most millionaires don't live extravagant, consumption-driven lifestyles. The pursuit of status is stratospherically expensive, and chances are that guy you see pulling out of the Super-Size McMansion in his Benz is a hardcore spender with above-average income but little accumulated wealth.
- The rich get rich by spending prudently (no $5,000 watches or $50,000 cars) and investing wisely. No matter your income, live below your means.
- If you want your kids to learn the lessons of financial independence, avoid giving them cash handouts, which they'll come to expect all their lives and will weaken them mentally. Just invest a crapload in their education and leave the rest alone.
All useful stuff, but the way the authors tell it makes the book a chore to read. The depth of the narrative never goes past personalizing those points with long-winded anecdotes filled with numbers, few of which succeed in really animating the messages. As the chapters go on, you find yourself just plowing through one indistinguishable story after another, most of which repeat the same points. This book could have easily been 100 (maybe 200) pages shorter.
So you want to be a millionaire? - Review written on March 08, 2008
Rating: 4 out of 5
9 customers found this review helpful.
This is the second time I am reading this book and it has enlightened me once again on what it takes to be a wealthy. I think some people who read the book give it an overly simplistic view, while there is a deeper insight that is often missed about millionaires.
In the beginning of the book in the introduction, the authors discuss what the definition of wealthy is. Millionaires seem to accumulate wealthy by investing their money rather then spending money. The Authors break down what the media has us perceive millionaires are by showing their big houses, their luxury cars and expensive suites. This is a good starting ground because you can see who the wealthy are. They draw on the fact that true millionaires are Prodigious Accumulator of Wealth (PAW), who does things to build wealth. They draw on Under Accumulator of Wealth (UAW, are great consumers, buying for status rather then for wealth.
In the first chapter the authors also talk about the top ethnic groups who are wealthy and their likelihood of becoming wealthy. This is a good motivator because it suggests that most American can or should be wealthy. One misinformed reviewer thought that Black was an ethnic group, when it is actually a race. The authors did a splendid job in not making wealth a race issue, but wanted to separate which ethnic group is more likely to be wealthy. While any one can become a millionaire, how long you reside in the United States is a big factor in that.
Chapter two is about being frugal and how the wealthy preserve their capital while others are consumers. They do not go over what types of wealth the PAW gathers, but they tell what they do not focus on. They also break down the mental picture of who the wealthy are. Do the wear Armani suites, drive Porches, and live in million dollars homes, no. The answer may be surprising because the media has given us a different picture of what wealthy should be. It is encouraging to note that most millionaires live in small towns, drive inexpensive cars, and wear moderate clothing. The authors break down the idea that wealthy people may not look like they have money because their focus is accumulating wealth, not in acquiring possessions. They recommend that this is counter productive.
Chapter 3 gives you an insight on time, energy and money. It goes over what the wealthy worry about and don't. It also shows what the wealthy know about shopping, their finances and their life. They most spend their time knowing the small stuff about their finances and how to save money. This chapter is a reflection of chapter two. It also goes over the consumption habits of the PAW and the UAW to show you how different they are.
Chapter 4 you aren't what you drive speaks about the kinds of cars the wealthy drive. This chapter should have been shortened because they seem to repeat the central themes of the chapter over and over to drive their point home. It was interesting to note that many of the PAW's drive used vehicles over 5 years old and rarely by new cars.
Chapter 5 Economic Outpatient and Chapter 6 Affirmative Action, Family Style both lost me. Economic outpatient is when a wealthy parent provides a yearly gift or money to a PAW child which the authors suggest is why they are PAW in the first place. Chapter six describes who typically gets the Economic Outpatient and gives the peril of these discussions. This lost me because I could not figure out who they authors were talking to. Were they talking to the reader as a parent, the reader as a child or the reader as both? When thinking about, their vagueness on this issue I think it was written for both; one not to except it and one not to offer it. I believe both of these chapters should have been combined and shortened to make it less confusing.
Chapter 7 Finding your Niche and Chapter 8 Jobs: Millionaire Versus Heirs could have also been combines because both discuses the types of jobs and service that one can perform to become wealthy. While it may be common knowledge that the wealthy own business but what types of jobs do they have if they are not entrepreneurs? Generally these types of jobs gives them a stream of income like lawyers, doctors, real estate professional, auctioneers and accountants.
If you are looking for a book that teaches you a step by step approach on how to be a millionaire, this is not the book for you. If you want a book that explains who these individuals are and how to be like them, then you want to read it. What the authors did was give a well researched book on who the wealthy people and how to be like them.
I gave this 4 stars because Amazon does not allow for me to give it 3 ½ stars because there is a wealth of information in the book.
Enjoy
Very worthwhile but thin read - Review written on December 18, 2007
Rating: 4 out of 5
9 customers found this review helpful.
Drs. Stanley and Danko have taken a somewhat empirical approach to answer the question "how do people become millionaires?" I have to say "somewhat" in that many of their observations, while empirical in nature, are not strictly valid statistically, since much of their material is obtained from focus groups and case studies, which are small sample groups.
However, Drs. Stanley and Danko provide an invaluable primer on the nature of millionaires. The most important of their observations is the need to live well below one's means. John Lithgow, in the near-classic "Cliffhanger" said it best: "Do you know what real love is...? Sacrifice." To become a millionaire, you have to give up a lot of other things. Over and over, the authors harp on the need for upper-middle class people to avoid the upper-middle class trappings of big houses, expensive cars and tastes.
I also appreciated the book for what it lacked. Unlike practically every other get-rich book currently out there, the authors did not fetishize the building of net worth through purchase of highly leveraged real estate. Yes, they do mention it, but mainly in the context of promoting stability and choice of middle class real estate as opposed to high-end real estate. Their argument is that a larger home leads not only to larger mortgage payments, but higher taxes, higher fixed costs, and a greater likelihood to try to acquire symbols of status that your neighbors have. As someone who is over-leveraged with his primary residence in terms of my overall net worth, and who has only partially resisted the tendency to try to keep up with the Joneses, I understand their reasoning and agree. Besides, people who think that their homes are going to appreciate like they have in the past five years are deceiving themselves.
The book also has the courage to say the truth that dares not speak its name: too much education is harmful to wealth accumulation. Essentially, the authors make their point by noting that: (1) time spent in school is time lost to earning a living; (2) professionals often feel like they have to have the trappings of success to go along with their "M.D.," "D.D.S." and "Esq." titles, which sucks them into a high-consumption lifestyle; and (3) a plurality of millionaires are entrepreneurs, who do not have the need for a lot of education. To many people, this is akin to just saying yes to drugs, but looked at objectively, the authors make sense.
However, the book does have some drawbacks. First, I'd like to see an update of this book. The economic analysis uses 1996 numbers. (I read the 1998 edition and now I see that there's a 2003 edition so maybe they've updated the numbers.) Moreover, some of the tax law forming the basis for their comments has changed, so the book is misleading. For example, the authors state that an intergenerational transfer of $10,000 can be made tax-free (p 214). The amount as of 2007 is actually $12,000. See 26 U.S.C. §2503(b).
Also, the book is highly repetitive in some of its examples and conclusions. Perhaps the authors felt like they needed to bulk their book up to make it more saleable, but it was annoying to read example after example of under-accumulators of wealth.
The book also only briefly discusses *why* people want to become millionaires. Not everyone has high priorities for the future, and let's face it, driving the current year's Lexus SUV is a lot more fun than driving a 1984 Buick LeSaber. The authors do mention (p 170), but do not emphasize, the thing that most commends thriftiness, hard work and sacrifice: the freedom that comes with self-sufficiency, or what Bob Brinker calls "critical mass." A direct discussion on this point would have been helpful.
Repetitive and dull. - Review written on December 03, 2007
Rating: 2 out of 5
12 customers found this review helpful, 4 did not.
Books about personal finance are 90% the same message: stay out of consumer debt, budget, live well under your means, don't spend frivolously, buy used cars instead of leasing new ones, invest 10-20% of your pay, and max out your retirement savings to lower your current tax bracket as well as plan for the future. They all say this. Each book might introduce 10% new material, and they each have their own spin on how you should do these things, and in which order. For instance, there's a huge divide between these authors as to whether it's more important to pay off your consumer debt, or start your savings.
This book, however, got really repetitive really fast. I was reminded of Jack Nicholson in "The Shining" typing "All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy" for page after page. This book could have done the same thing by printing the same message:
It's easy to become a millionaire when you never spend any money.
It's easy to become a millionaire when you never spend any money.
It's easy to become a millionaire when you never spend any money.
Right. I got that.
The authors display their extreme bias against paying any form of taxes with lots of tongue-in-cheek cutsie stories. While they provide some good food for thought about how you can legally lower your tax rate, they take it farther than I preferred. Apparently things like public schools, paved roads, police, and fire departments aren't good uses of any of their money! I could have done with less preaching on the taxes.
Later, they get silly with this frugality thing. One chapter praises a particular millionaire whose family has lived in the same 3 bedroom, 1 bathroom house for 40 years -- and I can just imagine the clutter and problems with that house and its one bathroom! The same millionaire drives old American cars because he goes fishing on the weekends and he likes to throw the raw, unwrapped, dead fish straight into the backseat.
Dude, are you kidding me?
Nope. This guy is the hero of the book - they saved the best for last!
So this is the Millionaire Next Door I'm supposed to emulate? The guy whose family has lived with 1 bathroom for 40 years, and whose car stinks to high heaven of dead fish?!
The book was interesting to get the mental wheels turning, but it definitely goes from the ridiculous to the sublime very soon. My advice is to check this book out from your local library. It does have something interesting to offer, but it's unlikely to be one you'll want to reference year after year.