Amazon.com Customer Reviews
SGF709 - Nice Look but Seiko has Quality Issues - Review written on November 19, 2006
Rating: 3 out of 5
I both love and hate the Seiko SGF709 watch.
It is my first dress watch in lieu of my ugly duckling, Casio DB360-1AV, which is both accurate and functional, with a 30 page data book (handy for telephone #s and passwords) and 5 alarms (speaker included) useful for future appointments (birthdays, meetings, doctor's appointments 6 months down the line, etc.).
Whereas the Casio is ugly but function, this Seiko is gorgeous- in an understated way- but it is also primitive, with just a day-date display, and second, minute and hour hands. The SGF709 is thin, keeps accurate time (within a second in the month and a half I've had it), weighs very little (thanks to the Titanium), and has a scratch resistant crystal.
However, the second hand does not line up on the tick marks as an earlier post indicated. Actually the second hand varies making it difficult to distinguish time when it is between seconds sometime and near a tick mark thirty seconds later. This last item is one of the basic functions of a dress watch and speaks to quality issues at Seiko; the second hand on an old Seiko of my fathers lines up perfectly.
The above problem irritates me but I'm unwilling to send it back for repair. Now I think of the erratic second hand as a reminder to do better quality work in all of my work. Still, I just wish some watch manufacturer made a quality watch dress watch with more useful features that would for the most part eliminate the necessity of carrying around a PDA.