Amazon.com Customer Reviews
Best Buy! - Review written on June 17, 2008
Rating: 5 out of 5
5 customers found this review helpful.
Yes, you want this lens, (or the "L"-glass version, if your wallet can afford the $1700 plus cost-this "non-L" version is around $350) even if you have something that covers this range. This is some finely crafted glass, and a best buy in terms of cost-to-benefit ratio. You get speed, DOF control, beautiful bokeh, and it's darn cheap to get into the whole world of protraiture, if you think about it.
You want this for portraits. Everybody and everything from your dog to the Queen of E looks silkier, more soulful and more loveable with this lens. It's perfect on a Canon 5D.
People say that it's not the equipment-it's the photographer. But, in this case, it really is the equipment. You can do natural-light photography under difficult and trying conditions, and you've got plenty of room to spare in the ISO, aperture and shutter speeds, because this lens is so fast and responsive. The lens is light and portable so you can take it everywhere. Once you "get" the feel of the fixed focal distance you just intuitively snap pics of the sweetest sweetness. Seriously, my friends think I'm a good photographer. Between you and I it's just that this lens rocks!
Great portrait lense - Review written on March 16, 2008
Rating: 3 out of 5
15 customers found this review helpful, 1 did not.
This is a great and fast portrait lens. I wasn't sure if I would need it, as I already have the 24-105 f4L IS USM and 70-200 f4L IS USM, but after reading the reviews and reasonable price I thought it would be worth the shot.
I found this lens generally produces my best portrait shots, and is fast under lower light conditions. Most of my portraits are under window light, so even f4 sometimes is too slow at 1/20 of a second or more. This lens lets me get faster and the 1.8 ap performs great background blurring. I did post a picture here as well so you can see a shot example with the lens. My only caveat is with the rebel Xti you get that multiplication factor and sometimes i need to back up further than I actually can, so you may want to consider the 50mm if you have an Xti.
Here's my take on what I use each of my lenses for:
1. 24-105 is my everyday walking around lens. Good flexibility, but not as sharp at f4, f5.6 seems to be the sweet spot.
2. 85 for serious portrait work and when light is low
3. 70-200, great general telephoto and great for kids portraits outside as it lets you keep your distance (so they aren't so aware of you) but still filling the frame.
Overall, the 85mm (or 50mm) probably belongs in your kit if you do portraits, especially given the price. It provides L quality shots without the L series price.
The reason I gave it 3 stars instead of 5 is because the lens stopped autofocusing after 2 months, and I've realized it is near impossible (at least for me) to manually focus at f1.8. I dropped it off at a service center, so hopefully it will return soon.
Get it you wont regret it. - Review written on December 12, 2007
Rating: 4 out of 5
13 customers found this review helpful, 1 did not.
I just got this lens about a month ago and let me say it is probably the best lens you can get for under 400. That is not to say that the under 400 dollar price tag makes it fall into a category with other lens of the same price, because this lens is leagues above most lens at this price. It feels easily as solid as the L glass that ive used, and is small and compact. The AF is super fast (ring type USM, I hate non ring type lens'), and with a 1.8 aperture, you can shoot in really low light. I just used this lens for a college hockey game (notoriously bad lighting) and was able to get some amazing captures. Just to put it in perspective, even a 70-200 f/2.8 would be almost unusable in that light. I was able to shoot as fast as 1/1000 at ISO 800 f/1.8. To be able to shoot with that fast of a shutter speed indoors is amazing. Plus, the 85 is built like a rock, it feels so solid. The first time you pick it up, I promise you will be surprised at how good it feels to hold, especially if you arent used to L glass.
Be warned though, this is not a portrait lens! On a 1.6 crop body like the xti it is approx. equal to a 135mm on a full frame. that means you have to stand roughly 13 yards back from a subject to get their whole body into the picture. In a room this lens is very very tight. Shooting from the corner of a rink its perfect for net shots, shooting from the corner of a room doesnt work so well, and thats where you WILL find yourself trying to take people pictures. If you want a portrait go for the 50mm f/1.8 or f/1.4, or even a 35 f/2. But if you are looking for a fast low light sports or concert lens this is it! Some head and shoulder shots are doable, dont get me wrong, but if your main intent is portraits you will be disappointed (as an outdoor lens its fine since you always have enough room but for group shots you will have to stand far away). Otherwise I highly highly recommend this lens...for the price its a must have i feel. Also it has great bokeh!
Fairly disappointed with this one. - Review written on October 28, 2007
Rating: 2 out of 5
9 customers found this review helpful, 8 did not.
First of all, I want to say that one of my personal problems with this lens is that I have a full frame DSLR. On a full frame camera, this focal length is not very desirable to me. It's not wide enough for most shots and it's not close enough for most close-ups. It's just occupying a strange length that I hardly ever use. I do freely admit that this focal length makes much more sense to me on a DSLR camera with a crop factor such as the digital rebels and most of the D series other than the 5d and Mark models. On those it is a whole different story. On my 5D. this length is virtually useless to me.
Low light? I didn't find this lens to live up to its reputation as being a good low light lens. I took many pictures with this lens in a variety of lighting situations and it was a dog in 99% of the low-light situations. Poor sharpness, poor bokeh, poor fringing, poor everything. Just bad results. The only time I really got this lens to shine and deliver great results was in perfect lighting outdoors during the "magic hour" or with a flash on. I already have lenses that shine in those conditions; I don't need another one.
Purple fringing? Horrible. Just horrible. Go to a search engine and type in this lens and purple fringing. Just watch the results you get! I had a few really great on location shots ruined by it last week. I mean it is like a solid purple border encasing the object. People on other sites have said that it is worse in lower light situations. Hmm...isn't this supposed to be a lower light lens? Isn't that kinda the point? So, basically I can shoot in lower light but my pictures will be scrapbook grade (I kid you not it is this bad) instead of the professional grade my clients demand? I also read a few sites where people said it is worse when the colors are more contrasting. So basically, I can avoid the issue if I shoot only scenes or subjects that are monochromatic?
Bottom line, despite what others have said I do see why this lens is not an "L" lens. This is not, in my opinion, an "L" lens that just happens not to say "L" on it. This is a midrange lens at best. Again just my experience. I realize that it doesn't help that all of my other lenses are "L" lenses so it is easier for me to see the difference and also it is natural to assume that I have built-in bias in this area. I sell pictures for a living part time so obviously I am more demanding for that reason too.
All of that being said, I have no reason to single out this lens because it is not professional grade. If it had performed well I would have come here and raved about it. For example, I think the base model $550 Rebel XT DSLR camera is one of the best cameras ever made. It's an outstanding camera in every way, not just for the price. I have used Canon kit lenses that I got off the internet for $35 and gotten outstanding results. Sadly, this is not an item that has outperformed or met expectations. It has not, in fact, met expectations in my view.
For cameras with a crop factor this probably makes much more sense. For me I am going to have to obtain a 135mm lens for my 5D to do the same thing that this lens would do on a 30D or Rebel. Also, if you plan on shooting in sunlight or with a flash I don't really see any issue with buying this lens. It's when the aperture gets wide that problems start to arise.