Amazon.com Customer Reviews
The Greatest War Movie Ever Made...Period - Review written on April 09, 2008
Rating: 5 out of 5
2 customers found this review helpful, 1 did not.
As a result of the largely inane dialogue that arises out of pop culture's rabid desire to impute a sense of hierarchy to aesthetic works, there has been a stupid tendency to exalt works that convey the abstruse, the obscure, the macabre, the anti-climactic, the anti-cliche if you will. But those who say that Spielberg is overrated or lacks the cerebral auteurism of a Kubrick, the uncanny ability to manipulate suspense and fear such as Hitchcock, the lugubrious quiddities of a Kurosawa, or the romantic wit of Woody Allen, are absolutely stupid, to say the least. Spielberg is arguably the greatest director ever, and indisputably the most influential (one need not look further than the preponderance of escapist films made after the 70's). It is no mere hyperbole to say that Saving Private Ryan is the bar none the greatest war movie ever made, and probably ranks among the top 10 or 20 greatest films ever made.
The movie commences with a trip down memory lane, as we see an old man and his family clearly in distress. Intuitively we must assume the man seeks isolation--affirmed by his retrospection after he sees the grave of a soldier; the connection is not yet drawn though between this old man the grave at his feet. From the opening scene, wherein the audience bares witness to the pure and undistilled brutality of military carnage, Spielberg's technical virtuosity--unmatched in the history of film making--is no more apparent than when he uses the hand-held oscillations of the camera to convey a sense of presence to the scene. That is to say, the audience feels as if it is indeed part of the calamity it is privy to. The jarring immediacy of death--a motif revisited throughout the movie--appears at the blink of an eye as soldiers drop dead without even leaving their boats, and even more glaringly as we see soldiers drown, caught in the straps of their uniform and gear. Spielberg, chided as a sentimentalist, an unfair claim espoused by many who frankly don't know what the hell their talking about (such absolute labels are silly), conjures a sense of realism one doesn't see even in Full Metal Jacket (another great war movie, that pales in comparison to this). When bullets kill a soldier asking for advice in front of Tom Hanks, his death is not dramatized but a reminder that stagnancy in war is fatal. As for my last observation of the first scene--the piez de resistance--Spielberg curiously mutes all sound in the middle of the scene and the audience is temporarily transformed into first person viewer; cringing as men grab their intestines to keep them from falling out, recoiling as blood leaks from every orifice as soldiers run by, stunned when Spielberg, in a brief fusion of comedy and tragedy that Aristotle would be proud of, shows us a soldier with one arm turning in circles looking for his other arm. This, among many technical manipulations, represents a reprisal of conscience because in that brief 1st-person transference we are reminded of the omniscience of death and men, who must kill or be killed, die or effect death, lose pieces of their souls in war in a way that can only be shown in silence.
This movie is not for the light-hearted, but violence, as many of the more acute reviewers have stated, is not gratuitous. Yes some of his movies are flawed, or are simply bad, and yes at times he values style over substance, some of which even lack the former, and yes he has made tons of money; but above all Spielberg is a genius and this movie should be added to the cannon of unequivocally great movies made in World & American cinema. I leave with a simple message: the greatness of a movie, a director, or indeed any art, lies in its ability to change a person--to laugh, to cry, to fear is not enough. If one leaves a movie with an altered perception of things, perhaps a heightened understanding, then that work of art is indeed great.
Experience - Review written on November 23, 2007
Rating: 5 out of 5
1 customer found this review helpful, 1 did not.
I remember working in the DotCom field in the Silicon Valley, going to see this movie on opening day. Like most hot-headed nerds in the valley, I ran my mouth off about accuracy in movie-making, nitpicking it, and generally being a loser after the movie was over while friends smoked cigarettes in the parking lot. An old Vietnam vet walked up to me, obviously shaken by what he had just watched and calmly, succintly, and tersely put me rightfully in my place. Now, nine years later, and two combat tours along the most hotly contested areas with the Taliban in Afghanistan later, I can say he was right. This movie touches so many nerves, makes things so real, I am at a loss for words. Languages - all of them - fail to express our emotions at their peaks and valleys alike, and as such, the feelings this movie bring forth of memories of loss, courage and brotherhood are all too real.
I'm not a WWII historian, so obviously, not an expert on the accuracy there. But the portrayal of the men, while limited in depth compared to the intimacy of knowledge men have of each other in real combat, is accurate, and I am an "expert" on such a thing. It's like modern war video games in that the actual simulation of combat itself is NOT accurate, but the emotional experience that it offers you is. If you want to watch a movie and have a reaction that really is indicitive of what it's like to witness front-line combat, I don't think any movie ever made has really come close to SPR.
What really got to me was the German captive. There's nothing quite as telling as the human face of the enemy, and the disastrous effects of sometimes doing the right thing - but it's still the right thing.
I love this movie. Spielberg is a wonderful human being for making this movie. I can have my parents watch it; their fathers, who were there in WWII, and their son, now at war himself - this film puts it all in context. I don't even need to say a word.
Thank you, Mr. Spielberg.
Great, just not the best.... - Review written on October 31, 2007
Rating: 4 out of 5
1 customer found this review helpful, 1 did not.
Powerful, moving, epic...the clichés go on; while it is all of these and more, it is also somewhat of a narrow view of the U.S. in WWII. Fictionalized and Americanized, Saving Private Ryan seems to be somewhat lacking in comparison to The Longest Day or Band of Brothers, though the former probably lacks the special effects, and the latter the all star cast to earn the same unquestioned respect.
Unlike The Longest Day, the film makes basically no mention of anyone else's contributions to D-Day besides the US. It also just a made up story within real events, despite the far more accurate Band of Brothers, along with other war films. It never really demonizes the Germans, but depicts them purely as unknown enemies and nothing else. Both The Longest Day and Tora! Tora! Tora! took the time to show the other side's part in the war, without turning too neutral or lopsided. Here they don't even bother with subtitles, further alienating audiences from any sort of understanding to what they are saying or thinking.
Though its gallons of gore and use of shaky camera work are important to combat scenes, they quickly lose their value after the opening half hour. Unfortunately, they seem to have inspired a sort of bloodier-than-thou standard by which to make war movies, most notably in Black Hawk Down, the school of thought being that louder and more violent somehow creates a better movie. Granted, since the end of the Vietnam War and into the 1980s, war films have always felt obligated to keep cranking up the violence, but Saving Private Ryan takes it to a new level, where we probably won't be returning from anytime soon.
Amid all this onscreen chaos most of the actors do a fine job and maintain a sort of order. Yes, they are all very strong stereotypes, a few almost intolerably so, plus Vin Diesel and Matt Damon seem out of place here, but nobody really detracts from the storytelling, and it leaves you wishing for more background. With these big stars and its director, the movie's success was never in question and it pays off in production values and the authenticity of equipment, weapons, uniforms, and sets.
Overdone in places (the opening shots of the American flag felt like a bad political ad), with too much emphasis on blood, guts, and the magic of Hollywood special effects, Saving Private Ryan nonetheless leaves viewers emotionally and physically drained. It is not an easy film to watch, regardless of the carnage, and its heavy emotions are not easy to forget. A strong war film throughout, it should be seen to gain some understanding of the US on D-Day.
A good but not great, WWII film... - Review written on September 06, 2007
Rating: 3 out of 5
3 customers found this review helpful, 7 did not.
Though I liked this movie overall, though there are some outstanding shots, sequences, and effects, and though I would probably recommend it to friends and acquaintances as one of the better cinema treatments about World War II, my expectations were too disappointed to engage in high praise of this work. I had many serious "problems" with SPR from the very opening overtly false patriotic flag scene to the very end.
The opening scene of Ryan as an old man visiting the Normandy cemetery was fine except for one very annoying factor, John Williams, lush, overly-sentimental BS musical pretensions, which we've heard 100 times already, and in almost every scene in which this score swelled, I felt it was inappropriate. I would've much rather have heard no music whatsoever throughout the film, or at least a very subtle form of and use of. I don't really like being manipulated like this. And various scenes do this. A lush musical war, no thanks.
The most striking example of the film's almost soulless failure to do justice to its apparent agenda and real blood and guts reality (to show how utterly abominable real war is), brings me to yet another complaint. The films' cinema verite, shaky documentary camera style. NYPD Blue on amphetamines...
A little of this "style" can go a long way. Drenching entire scenes lasting several minutes, was totally ineffective and pretentious to me. Some of the wobbly camera in the opening sequence, was very potent, like the troops running towards the beach. This gave the viewer a real sense of being there, of being in a frantic state of confusion, attempting to move forward into a frightening and imposing blur of horror and motion. However, a bit later, when Hanks and his men are using a mirror at the end of a rifle to try to find out where a particular German machine gun is firing from, why shake the camera? When the medics are trying to fix up wounded men on the beach, why shake the camera? If one were there watching these things, they would simply not be seeing it from this perspective. Again, this whole technique was so overused to me.
What's so disappointing about SPR is that it just could've been done so much better, in so many areas. Long, boring, unimaginative sequences are followed by Hollywood hokum. The truly outstanding radar attack sequence, stood out. The characters were given a REAL identity to me during this portion. But for all the talk (hype?) of blood and gore and entrails in SPR's beginning, to me, the only really powerful depictions of real war in the film, was specifically in the segment when one of the GI's chests was pumping gushes of bright red blood, in addition to some opening shots.
Why wasn't there so much more of this however? Why not show utterly horrible pain and suffering and death? That which is real war? That which is happening even as I write this, which I hope Spielberg or one of his other cronies may deal with in the near future, about Iraq. Holding my breath, but not too long.
The entire Axis prisoner scene, was good. There was a real tension here, and I easily felt myself not watching a movie anymore, but feeling as if I had some sort of personal stake in what I was watching. In SPR, Spielberg's more delicate and subtly discriminating add-ons, were clearly the best moments of the film. All the blood and violence and special effects of the opening and closing sections (the closing sections having nearly as much power as the opening ones), never came close for me, in displaying the real horror of war, than this one little middle section, which culminated in two men on the same side, almost killing each other because a "bad guy" POW was being released.
There were and are WAY TOO MANY shots for me of Americans mowing down whole groups of German soldiers, like as if this was a standard scene out of WWII (it wasn't). It IS a standard, stereotypical scene out of WWII MOVIES however. I had hoped for much more however, in SPR. Otherwise, in Spielberg's fantasy WWII world, whole German squads can easily be mowed down by a single GI, and tanks and other weapons can be disabled with nothing more than some good old GI Joe bravery. For all the effects, for all the blood and guts that ARE shown, SPR continually refuses to step over certain lines. It wants to be two things at once, which is its ultimate undoing, to show the "reality" of war, but to do it in an entertaining Hollywood story suited for mass consumption.
I have to say this film, like digestible war-movie filler candy before and after, satisfies for awhile, but there are no great ideas here, no true moral or political or philosophical "center" or soul. And there is nothing groundbreaking here except for a few FX enhanced "war scenes." There are much better WWI&II films, of all stripes. I'd suggest "Enemy at the Gates," or "Paths of Glory,' or even the low budget "A Midnight Clear." For starters.
This is a fairly good war film, but not a "great" war film. DVD extras aside. What the film clearly does wrong, cannot in the final analysis, overcome the few things it does really great and right. Entertaining? Yes. Transcendent? But only if one is easily prone to hype, political, or cinematic, or falsely (IMO) "patriotic" propaganda. This viewer is none of the above, and in the end, to me is just another Steven Spielberg misfire, which garnered and continues to receive critical/popular praise truly undeserved, compared to so many other much more worthy WWII films. As well as documentaries. I wish the whole script had been rewritten/filmed, concentrating on D-Day alone, and never diverted into a corny, schmaltzy retread of almost any other good or bad WWII flick since, or afterwards.
VISCERAL IN-YOUR-FACE WAR EPIC THAT YOU WON'T FORGET!! - Review written on September 04, 2007
Rating: 5 out of 5
3 customers found this review not to be helpful.
'SAVING PRIVATE RYAN' STRUCK ME AS: HARD-HITTING - GRAPHIC & EMOTIONAL WITHOUT OVERT SENTIMENTALISM OR SIMPLY THE 'CITIZEN KANE' OF WAR FILMS,
VERY SIMPLY STATED:
This is the most visceral, in-your-face war epic I have ever experienced. But "Saving Private Ryan" is much more than that, as it gives us a well-developed story line and characters we come to care about during the natural unfolding of the story.
WHAT'S IT ALL ABOUT?:
After landing on Normandy through the most visceral and graphically-realistic re-creation ever put to film, this ensemble of American soldiers and the film itself slow down to catch their breath and hand us a great story, having now prepared us for it. The heroic "everyman" types that comprise this small band are fleshed out as they go through their mission to find Private Ryan. It's a sort of follow-the-yellow-brick-road-to-Hell kind of mission that is just about impossible for them to reconcile. What is so important about Private Ryan? See the film and you will find out.
BOTTOM LINE:
Action, drama, and morality are all mixed together in the cauldron of wholesale killing that was the second World War. The "right thing" to do is very difficult to decipher, both by these soldiers and by us viewers, but in no film is the topic more in-your-face realistic and emotionally-supercharged.
After seeing the Normandy sequences in this film, such similar epic recreations as in "The Longest Day" seem not just tame, but also emotionally-removed and from a safe distance. "Saving Private Ryan" is one of the best and most captivating films of any genre that I have ever experienced.
----- CAST
Tom Hanks - Capt. John Miller
Edward Burns - Private Richard Reiben
Tom Sizemore - Sgt. Horvath
Jeremy Davies - Cpl. Upham
Vin Diesel - Pvt. Caparzo
Adam Goldberg - Pvt. Mellish
Barry Pepper - Pvt. Jackson
Giovanni Ribisi - T/4 Medic Wade
Matt Damon - Pvt. James Ryan
Dennis Farina - Lt. Col. Anderson
Ted Danson - Capt. Hamill
Harve Presnell - Gen. George Marshall
----- PRODUCTION CREW:
Steven Spielberg - Director / Producer
Ian Bryce - Producer
Mark Gordon - Producer
Gary Levinsohn - Producer
Robert Rodat - Screenwriter
Janusz Kaminski - Cinematographer
John Williams - Composer (Music Score)
ABOUT THE DVD:
Great Transfer of both audio and video. Compared to the VHS edition, it is like viewing a different and better film due to the transfer, NOT any change in the content, which is identical.
"Director's Message" is well put and needs to be said, but I can only say I wish there was more, a lot more.
Behind-The-Scenes Featurette: A segment titled "Into The Breach" was excellent, but frankly this film needs more than a 24-minute short and you can get more on the 2-Disk DVD 60th Anniversary edition.
Truly a movie that will stick with you - Review written on July 18, 2007
Rating: 5 out of 5
I had to watch Saving Private Ryan a second time -years later- to fully understand the importance of World War II, and specifically, what the soldiers had to go through. The first 30 minutes of film were truly something unbelievable. The emotions I felt watching the soldiers landing on shore and being surrounded by enemies who didn't hesitate to attack was overwhelming. I seriously wanted to cry. It really touched me on a personal level that I've never felt in a war movie before. It made me realize what was going on. 40 years before I was born *this* kind of extreme violence was happening on Earth. It was enough to make me sick. Human beings killing each other left and right. I've never seen a war movie really show the extreme nature of war quite like this film.
I'm totally serious- the movie begins on a really intense level, and continues for the next 30 minutes without letting up on all sorts of gun shootings, explosions, bodies falling apart and drifting away, hopeless feelings lingering in the air. I can't imagine what it must be like to serve in war, and honestly, this movie really opened my eyes and showed me how important it is to support our troops and what they must be going through on a daily basis. The film may be only 2 and a half hours long, but the war lingered on for years, and I can only imagine it eventually reached a point when people were beginning to wonder "Is this war ever going to end?"
Saving Private Ryan will surprise and shock you on many occasions. Sometimes the film seems so real it's almost like you're there with the soldiers. I recommend buying the movie.