Amazon.com Customer Reviews
Good For The Money - Review written on January 07, 2008
Rating: 4 out of 5
3 customers found this review helpful.
When you're getting a pair of 16x50 binoculars at this price-point, it would probably be harsh of me to criticize them too hard, so long as I can see through them effectively :-)
They're heavy - but that's what I expected, so no complaints there.
The strap that comes with these is made of nasty thick plastic - a kind of strap that I haven't seen since I got a cheap SLR in the early 1980s. Completely pointless (unusable in my opinion), and the first thing I would advise is to go buy the strap/support system of your choice and don't relay on the nasty accessory that comes with.
The binoculars come with lens caps on. I haven't figure out if they intend you to use them all the time to protect the lenses, or if they're just for show in the box. The large caps are fine, but the small ones do not stay attached, so don't rely on them to protect.
In use, the quick focus mechanism is actually very effective but definitely requires two hands to operate as it's a little stiff (and as a lever, you have to be able to press down on either side). I guess few people would be operating something this heavy with one hand, but it does mean that both hands are under tension as you have to have fingers on the focus mechanism.
Optically, these are absolutely built to the price. Definite chromatic aberration here giving a nice blue/yellow fringe, especially at longer distances. But for the price, I kind of expected that. Diopter correction works well.
Overall, a great product for the price. I would possibly recommend looking at spending a little more to get some better optics, but really for this money it's a great way to get this much magnification.
Enjoying, but.... - Review written on November 23, 2007
Rating: 3 out of 5
8 customers found this review helpful.
They were a gift for casual ASTRONOMY. The distortion towards the edges of the field of view is rather large, but will not prevent you from enjoying if you have a love for the night sky. They actually are pretty decent at collecting light - not too dim. For $48-$60 really a good deal.
The magnification is no problem on a tripod for astronomy, but even if you have steady hands, though it is very light, you won't see the faint stars nor easy nebulas as nice as you like - but that is not the binoculars faultt. The "B" on the front of the axle is really a cap that you can remove and screw a tripod adaptor in.
But - you still get what you pay for. Two major problems.
(1) NEVER exposed these to any mistreatment, bangs or anything but kid glove overly careful treatment, in their case and during transport. The pair I received had lost columnation terribly during use one night. This means the image turn double because the two oculars became misaligned. Sent it back to Bushnell, and for $10 UPS and their $10 lifetime warranty fee, they came back good as new (maybe it was another new pair, I couldn't tell since mine also looked new. The columnation has been fine since then. Hower, they were completely useless and made made me very nauseaous even to try to use and I missed them for a couple of weeks.
(2) The focuser mechanism is very poor. There is nothing you can do about this. It frequently moves out of focus for any reason (press eyes softly against the rubber shades to avoid light, for example, or plenty of other reasons you can't figure out why. It is a very coarse, crude focus as well, so while it moves quickly the additional speed comes at an unacceptable price, and you will always over correct before getting it right. This impacts daytime viewing as much as astronomy. Sure you get an image, but it does not a crisp image for the same reasons, whether you are conscious of this or not. It would take looking through a real focused binocular to prove this when you are having so much fun...
Binoculars are fun and it is easy to overlook these problems, but when you think about them you will realize the adage is true that you get what you pay for. I don't know of an alternate suggestion that is better in the price range, but I have three years of use so far, and while in the short term my gift met the gift budget, in the long term with my love for astronomy and just "binocularing" I wish I could pay $50 more and get a nice circular focuser instead of this crude thing that rocks from sideto side with no accuracy at all. Keeping them is just like having an old perscription of eyeglasses: useful, and let's you see - but you know there is much better.
Good binoculars if you're not too close - Review written on January 19, 2007
Rating: 3 out of 5
5 customers found this review helpful.
These binoculars are super nice. They really get you close to the action, and the 3-D effect is terrific. Detail and sharpness are very good as well.
If you wear glasses, you're better off removing them. If you leave your glasses on it just doesn't work very well. On the other hand, you are allowed to adjust each eyepiece separate if you're like me and don't see 20/20. However, there is a trick to it because you can only adjust individual focus on the right eyepiece. So you cover the right eyepiece and focus the binoculars, then cover the left side to fine-tune the focus for your right eye. I found it a bit counter-intuitive, and think it would be better if you could separately adjust the focus on each side. Even so, once you have it dialed in, there are marks on the frame and the eyepiece that you can use as reference for when it gets borrowed or changed inadvertently.
My biggest issue with these binoculars is that they won't focus in close enough. The target has to be close to 100' away. Since they're high-powered binoculars, that's probably ok for most uses. But I spend a lot of time watching birds 20' from my window. Now I'm going to have to buy another pair for that purpose.
They're also heavy. Expect to put them down often to rest. That's probably normal for binoculars this powerful. When my wife first used them, she was shocked at how large far-away objects were.
HEAVY, and UNSTEADY FOCUS - Review written on August 24, 2005
Rating: 1 out of 5
19 customers found this review helpful, 7 did not.
I read other review, and decided to give it a try. As soon as I recieve it in the mail, and opened the box, I realized this was a mistake. CHEAP quality Binocular with "high power" being a selling point. It came in already broken with two eye ruber pieces falling apart. you can see how the cheap glue was being used to put it in place! It is extremly heavy to hold in hands for more than one minute for nature observation. You will be CONSTANTLY ajdusting the focus. Your fingers bumps with focus bar while you are holding it. Indeed Strap, Case, Lense protectors are all cheap crap, and annoying to have it all ON~! I am taking this back, and buying MADE IN JAPAN "NIKON EAGLE VIEW" 100 times BETTER. YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR~!!!!!!
They're OK - Review written on April 05, 2005
Rating: 3 out of 5
29 customers found this review helpful, 1 did not.
I gave it only 3 stars because the focus is just a marketing gimmick that creates a cheap focusing mechanism. A decent traditional wheel for focusing is superior. You can't easily get a good focus, pressing your eyes against the eyepiece can force them out of focus, and it's easy to bump the rocker bar. At 16x power, you have to carefully adjust focus and a rocker bar is an awful design. You have to use both hands to focus: you can press down on one side of the rocker bar, but not up, so to go in and out of focus to get good sharpness, you have to press down with one hand's finger and then press down with the other hand's finger. The rocker bar is terrible idea, especially for 16x! To make matter's worse, there is a fair amount of play in the rocker bar. The rocker bar seems to be the limiting factor on short distances. 40 feet seemed to be the shortest distance they would focus. Stars come into focus well before the limit of the long-distance focus is reached, possibly indicating questionable workmanship, or maybe it makes it better for those who are really-bad near-sighted.
The moons of jupiter were clear and sharp even under city lights. Since it was the brightest "star" in the sky I thuoght i was looking at venus, but when i saw the 3 sharp dots surrounding the round disk, i knew it had to be jupiter. You have to rest them on a chair to see the moons.
The price here at Amazon (with free shipping) is $20 less than my local Walmart after our 10% taxes.
16x requires a fence or car or window to provide the stability needed to make full use of 16x. Even without a prop, it's good, but if your not going to use a prop, 12x50 is better because the amount of light is greater and the field of view is larger.