Amazon.com Customer Reviews
A lame, predictable movie - Review written on August 12, 2005
Rating: 2 out of 5
I saw this at Blockbuster for rent and saw Morgan Freeman's name on it so I decided to rent it. I thought it was going to be a solid thriller but boy was I wrong.
This movie is an action movie, and one really unrealistic movie. Morgan Freeman is great as usual and there is some fun. But, the movie is predictable, unrealistic, dumb and has bad acting. Christian Slater's acting was horrible and Morgan Freeman can't save the movie. The plot is neat, in which an armored truck transports a lot of money in a huge flood. But, some crooks hold it up to steal the money. The problem is that the officer in the truck won't let them off so easy and tries to bring the money to where it's supposed to go.
I had the movie predicted 10 minutes into it and the movie had no suspense or anything. All it was, was Christian Slater beating everyone up. It had some good chases but besides that and some ok action, it was a bad movie.
It's not even worth renting because of its terrible acting, predictability, and basically everything about it.
Morgan Freeman is good but this movie degrades him. This movie is mindless junk but not good mindless junk. Commando is good mindless junk but this isn't. Forget this movie and just act like it doesn't even exist. This movie isn't interesting at all and I recommend never watching it.
Fun action flick - Review written on May 20, 2005
Rating: 4 out of 5
4 customers found this review helpful.
Yup - the plot does stretch your ability to suspend disbelief, but it stops short of actually asking you to hang it by the neck until it's dead - the story is unlikely, but there are no obvious plot holes to disrupt the fun.
Morgan Freeman dishes up his usual excellence in this role - a crook looking for a retirement fund, with a typical crew to help - a screwup 20s rowdy, an unemployed high school science teacher, and a scripture-quoting pro.
Christian Slater is, well, Christian Slater - I've been a fan for years, and this is yet another appearance of the wisecracking, intrepid guy that Mr. Slater plays so often. It'd get repititious if it weren't so much fun. He's at the end of a "clean out the banks before they're flooded" run, with $3 million in the truck when it's stuck in a deep spot in the ever-present water.
Minnie Driver does a fine, if understated, job as the woman who stayed in town too long, preparing a church she's been restoring to weather the flood, who gets involved in the scramble for the cash. While she's on the side of the good guys, there's no real steam between her and Slater.
Randy Quaid is the Sheriff who recently lost his re-election, and is bitter and angry, but determined to do a good job as long as he's on the clock - until the temptation of that money proves to be too much for him.
For a film set almost entirely in a nighttime rain, the camerawork is amazingly good. The effects work nicely, the flood gives us an element that's unusual in action films, and the cast works well together, even when the script gets a tad overblown.
The widescreen DVD has a few basic features, but is pretty scant in extras - no deleted scenes, no trailers for other movies, nothing you'd not have seen in the theatre but the trailer for this film - which was a disappointment, but not fatal.
All in all, a fun 96 minutes of video, if you're not in the mood for something deep and meaningful.
Critics of critics,step off - Review written on May 18, 2005
Rating: 1 out of 5
2 customers found this review helpful, 9 did not.
For those who continue to bash other reviewers for giving their opinions of movies here,please get a life. They are entitled to post reviews,just as you are.
This is standard D grade hollywood action fare,about as contrived and stupid as it gets. The acting isn't really an issue,here,it's the braindead plot and script,which frequently makes no sense. The special effects aren't really impressive,either,since much of the film looks as if it was filmed in a bathtub.
By the way,it seems in vogue amongst Amazon browsers to excuse and apologize for any mediocre and brainless flick by stating 'lighten up,it's an action movie!',or 'it's a comedy!'. I suppose any dreck ever vomited upon the landscape can be immune to criticism under these terms. That said,if you really,really,really,really liked 'Con Air',and you're in the mood for something less weighty,this little film is for you!
Critics of all kinds, please step off! - Review written on April 16, 2005
Rating: 4 out of 5
3 customers found this review helpful, 3 did not.
OK,
I am really getting tired of all the "I am smarter than the masses" reviews.
These people who come in here and apply for a real critics job bashing every movie they can get their dishonest hands on.
While bashing, they throw comments in to make sure you know that THEY know all the in's and out's of movie making, actors, directors, plots.. blah blah blah.
This movie is an action flick.
It's funny how so many say how "unbelievable" it is, as if somewhere out there, there are 3 million dollar bank heists every day with subplots, strong dialog and explosions all around.
Action flicks are just that, action flicks.
This is not real life, and will never portay real life.
It is a couple hour diversion made mainly for men who like to see bullets and flying debris.
In other words... me.
Stop trying to tear down movies you really didn't want to see in the first place and go find a tree to hug and preach to your intellectual friends, because of course, you all know better than the rest of us.
My review:
Good action Flick to have on the shelf, not quite the calibur of a summer blockbuster arnie type, but a good one to throw in the dvd player when there is nothin on TV.
Oh and one other thing.. why can't all these great critics format their paragraphs? It's a wonder.
3M Dollars Up for Grabs in Soggy Berg... - Review written on March 22, 2005
Rating: 3 out of 5
1 customer found this review helpful.
...would you want a cut? Of course. Unless you're Christian Slater. Everybody else is irredeemable in this dreary, rainy thriller. Even lil ol' Betty White has a shot gun aimed at Slater and Driver. And Lou Grant ends up bleeding from the jugular...Jet ski chases, exploding transformers electrocuting guys, and boats thru stainglassed windows punctuate the chase scenes: a pivotal shoot-out atop a cemetery beneath the flood waters is the story's peak. Freeman seems benevolent, but like he says, ultimately he's in it only for the dough. Driver and Slater it seems, must've been a good idea for the romantic angle, on paper, but something's amiss in practice--the sparks between each other don't show. (I heart Slater and Driver, but together, they were simply adequate here.)Quaid, you figure something's up with from the beginning (I can never forgive him for playing that 'droid in Pluto Nash--in fact I can't forgive anyone having to do with anything in Pluto Nash.)...you can't continue playing these small town rube types forever without getting small town corrupted. What? You wouldn't try to get that money, given that state of wash?
SOGGY BUT FUN - Review written on July 28, 2004
Rating: 4 out of 5
6 customers found this review helpful.
HARD RAIN is enough to make you never want to see it rain again. Filmed entirely during the horrific storm and with the threatening collapse of the local dam, this movie requires some squinting of the eyes just to tell who's who. Director Mikael Solomon keeps things moving, and if the whole plot wasn't so darn preposterous and absurd, this could have been a classic. There are some great chase scenes, double crosses, etc., etc. It's just not very believable.
Christian Slater's laconic performance is reminiscent of a young Jack Nicholson, but he seems awkward and clumsy as an action hero (ditto BROKEN ARROW), but he's pleasant. Morgan Freeman reprises his bad guy role from CHAIN REACTION and the future NURSE BETTY with his usual grace and precision. Morgan's probably never given a bad performance. Randy Quaid is grim and vile as the sheriff gone bad, and Betty White/Richard Dysart provide some fun comic relief as an elderly couple who refuse to leave town. (Wonder what happens to them though---last we see them they're stuck in a tree?).
HARD RAIN may have benefitted from a more believable lead, say Bruce Willis, but it's entertaining and delivers, in spite of its silliness.
Not a film to watch during the daytime - Review written on July 23, 2004
Rating: 4 out of 5
1 customer found this review helpful, 2 did not.
It was constantly suggested that I watch this film during the daytime. Not a chance. It's just not one of those films! It's filmed in one night (the daytime scenes were cut out), and a lot of the time, you can barely see the characters, due to the darkness of the picture. Normally, I would find that extremely annoying, but for this film, it actually works. So I was very happy when this was put in the DVD player, and it was dark! (And I discovered I can take a reasonable picture on my digital camera in the darkness without someone realising until the flash goes!) Written by the same guy who wrote Speed, Graham Yost (yes, I do shock people when I come out with these interesting little facts - it's only my favourite film!), you know it's gonna be good.
I think soon enough I'm definitely going to be in a full blown Christian Slater mood, as I'm going to see him in a play of One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest! (He'll be so good as McMurphy) So this'll mean endless re-runs of Robin Hood: Prince Of Thieves - I really should get Heathers on DVD.
Despite the fact that he's losing his hair at the same rate as Jack Nicholson, he's extremely cute, and he definitely looked a bit of alright in this - was it the uniform that did it for? Or the Bruce Willis-esque white T-shirt?! Nice! And his nice short hair too - don't get me wrong, I like him with the floppy hair he sports in Robin Hood/Heathers, but the shorter the better.
Sometimes the characters are very confusing, especially as certain characters constantly switch sides, so you never know who's a goodie, and who's a baddie. But the way Christian & Morgan Freeman's characters eventually end up coming together against an evil, corrupted sherriff (played by Randy Quaid).
With all the water, you're instantly reminded of Titanic, and some scenes are extremely similar, although it's not possible, as both films were filmed/released at different times, so just coincidence. Minnie Driver (no doubt following up Kate Winslet's comments) has said she hated filming in all the water, probably for days at a time, and who can blame her? Coming from a non-swimmer (I know it's as easy as riding a bike - oh wait...), this film was sometimes a scary prospect for me to watch, as I put myself in the characters positions, and figured I probably would have freaked out in their (albeit, sometimes unreal) positions.
Some of the comic relief (yes there is some) is provided by the nervous old man and his wife, culminating in a hilarious situation in a boat.
This is definitely a great film, to watch Christian Slater get wet & wild. And Morgan Freeman plays the same kinda character that he plays in Chain Reaction - you keep waiting for him to pull out the big fat cigar. Highly recommended. So glad I watched this. Now bring on the Christian Slater movies!
Quite Entertaining Nonsense - Review written on February 09, 2004
Rating: 3 out of 5
3 customers found this review helpful.
It's set, entirely at night, in the small Indiana town of Huntingburg which is being evacuated as a serious flood develops. But there are a few folk still around: Christian Slater and Edward Asner, the drivers of an armoured truck with $3M in the back; Morgan Freeman, the leader of a small gang of thieves with their sights set on the same 3M, Randy Quaid, a sheriff with some unappealing character traits; Minnie Driver, a churchwarden who has lingered rashly to protect her beloved stained glass windows; Richard Dysart and Betty White, an elderly couple stubbornly refusing to leave for fear of looters, thrown in for comic relief. Slater escapes from Freeman and his pals with the money which he hides in a cemetery. They pursue him on jet skis... Everyone gets very wet. Explosions. Gunfights. Hair's breadth escapes by lead characters trapped in rising floodwater. General mayhem. Credulity strained to breaking point. Significantly above average American action movie. More original than most. Quite good fun. Nothing special. But worth a look if you like this sort of thing.
Just a little bit of info..... - Review written on May 10, 2001
Rating: 4 out of 5
1 customer found this review helpful.
first i want to start off by saying that i love christian slater and i thought this was a great movie...however, there were a few things that i thought were kinda lame, mostly some of the lines...like when the sheriff (i am at a loss for his name at the moment, Randy Quaid's character) says something about eating ... for breakfast, lunch, and dinner and then says that from now on everything will be ... free, that was pretty lame...it sounded like something that sounded good at three in the morning when everyone was getting a little giddy around the table and everything that was said either sounded good or to hilarious to pass up, ya know? also, something else that has been bothering me...when the one guy quotes a song..."at night we go down to the river and into the river we dive"? remember that? well, that song was not sung by springsteen (i dont think i spelled his name right, forgive me), it was sung by billy joel, trust me, my friend used to have a thing for billy joel and i had to listen to it day and night! lol...anyway, thats just my opinion, i think people should make own opinion about everything, so see "hard rain" and make up your own mind, i thought it was great, you may not, but it may turn out to be your favorite movie, you never know where it may take you! thanks for your time. :o)
Don't let them fool you - Review written on January 09, 2001
Rating: 5 out of 5
I'm writing this short review just because I saw some pepole trashed this movie which might discourge you to rent/buy it.
This movie is great , it is not hyped and doesn't have the big names "stars" but the action is very good , the cinematics is stunning buteifull and the plot and use of the flood motive to create an intersting enviorment for the story to take place is good enough.
There are no ground breaking ideas or special effects here but what there is is done very well and I've enojyed this movie alot although I missed about 15 mintues from the start .
Somebody Get Arnold! - Review written on December 06, 2000
Rating: 1 out of 5
1 customer found this review helpful, 5 did not.
There's action, water (plenty of water), gun play, more action, actors from the "A" list (Morgan Freeman, Minnie Driver), one from the "B" list (Randy Quaid) and the "star" of it all, Christian Slater; "It" being none other than "Hard Rain," an "action/thriller" written by Graham Yost and directed by Mikael Salomon. Going in, it would seem that it has all the elements required of a film of this genre to succeed. Going out, one must pause to reflect and wonder: How did this movie ever see the light of day? How did it even get made? Better yet, why? For anyone unlucky enough to have suffered through this muddle in a theater, the only "thrill" would've been finally being able to leave when it was over. One of the blessings of video is that it adds to one's options; in this case, being able to TURN IT OFF and cut your losses. The trouble begins with the screenplay by Yost (who as a writer is responsible for a number of decent, exciting movies, including "Speed, "Broken Arrow" and "Mission To Mars"), whose concept here is suspect from the start. In the middle of a flood, which quickly renders everyone practically immobile (almost immediately every character is up to their waist in water), four men planning to rob an armored car continue on as if their feet are still on dry ground; and it's only the beginning of a plot that stretches credibility just too far. As it plods along (I should say "slogs" along), even suspending disbelief will not work here; sure, this is an action flick and you have to accept what you're given to a certain extent. But here we're to believe, for instance, that no less than six lifelong law-abiding, decent citizens suddenly become murderers and thieves, two with some premeditation, four at the drop of a hat. It just doesn't wash, by anyone's measuring stick. Soon frames of reference begin to cloud and merge, which creates an even more ambiguous reality; halfway through this movie you can't tell the good guys from the bad guys without a scorecard. And, as if to make sure that none of this can be taken with even a grain of salt, the dialogue is so bad it must be the stuff of which an actor's worst nightmares are born. Better they should have no lines to say than be saddled with this inane prattle. At least when the story picks up the town has already been evacuated, except for the Sheriff and three or four officers and a utility worker, and of course the obligatory (in this case three) others who refuse to leave. This is a positive note, however. Fewer characters means fewer occasions for banal utterances. The crushing blow is delivered, however, by director Salomon, whose lack of imagination renders this film D.O.A. And he should have seen it coming; it's his job to know what works and what doesn't. He's the one with the placard that says "The Buck Stops Here." The real shame of this debacle, though, is the waste of such talent as Freeman and Driver, especially, and even Quaid and Slater. They deserve better. To their credit, they all did as much as was humanly possible with the material with which they were given to work. This is one of those projects that must have looked good on paper, but somewhere in the execution went south. And apparently very quickly. The supporting cast includes Edward Asner (Uncle Charlie), Michael A. Goorjian (Kenny), Richard A. Dysart (Henry), Betty White (Doreen) and Mark Rolston (Wayne). On the positive side, "Hard Rain" does have some decent special F/X. But the best thing about this movie is the fact that it makes one appreciate a really good film, the kind we've come to expect from the people involved with this one. It makes you appreciate Schwarzenegger. It even makes you appreciate Van Damme. Then again, this isn't the first time that actors of this caliber have been entangled with a movie this bad. In fact, if you listen closely you can almost hear Michael Caine off somewhere chuckling and whispering "Jaws 4" to himself in a quiet aside.
Twisted plot, but still a good movie - Review written on May 16, 2000
Rating: 4 out of 5
5 customers found this review helpful.
Hard Rain might have a twisted plot, pitting an armored truck guard against some robbers who are trying to steal 3 million dollars, but that doesn't really make it a bad movie. All the while, they're surrounded by a massive flood as their main obstacle. Hard Rain has some of the best actors such as Morgan Freeman and Randy Quaid playing the leading roles and they all do great jobs. Hard Rain also has some good action sequences and a lot of suspense throughout the film. It's like a wet and wild goosechase with everybody trying to catch Christian Slater in order to get the money. The special effects with all the water and rain couldn't have been done much better. Hard Rain is just another usual action movie until Morgan Freeman joins Christian Slater and they both team up and try to survive against the other robbers. That's when this movie gets a lot better with all the suspense and action.
If you like good action movies with some suspense added in, you will probably like Hard Rain. The only drawback is the twisted plot, sometimes you might wonder what the movie is really about. But watch it and you'll figure it out without a problem.