Amazon.com Customer Reviews
Disappointing - Review written on May 11, 2009
Rating: 2 out of 5
1 customer found this review helpful, 1 did not.
After all the praise I'd read about this book, I bought a copy (and quickly resold it).
Nominally this is a 160 page book, but many of those pages are filled with the author's photos, and like a copy of Byte there's relatively little actual text. What text there is belies the 2004 date or the claim that it's updated: despite the occasional token reference to digital photography, this is a book about shooting film with 1980's technology, and is additionally biased toward landscapes. The author is big on focus-then-recompose shooting, which is much less feasible when shooting, say, humans than it is for mountains and distant tree silhouettes. The techniques advocated range from being inefficient with today's (or even 2004's) modern cameras to being inappropriate for modern dense digital sensors.
There is a modest to moderate amount of common-knowledge content, but an hour spent with a web browser will give the reader that and more without all the anachronisms.
Essential concepts explained - Review written on April 05, 2009
Rating: 5 out of 5
2 customers found this review helpful.
If you own an (D)SLR or point-and-shoot with manual settings, this book will get you out of auto mode. Make sure you know how to control the basic manual operations of your camera before you proceed.
This is not a camera operation manual, and it is not a technical treatise on focal length or depth of field. This book is a detailed, well-explained guide to understanding how the myriad combinations of aperture, shutter speed, ISO, lighting, and metering mode affect the look of a photograph, and how to gauge which settings to use for your desired exposure. Peterson also tackles the concept of 18% reflectance, when to over- or under-expose, filters, and some more advanced techniques.
Every sub-section (about 2 pages) explains a particular consideration or technique, with several illustrative photos that demonstrate the technique, with an desciption of the lens used, focal length, and exposure information, and why he chose them.
This book is invaluable to those who want to get more consistent results and understand how and why their good pictures are good. The result will be less "chimping" and more shooting.
Not bad, but a little disappointing - Review written on April 04, 2009
Rating: 3 out of 5
2 customers found this review helpful, 1 did not.
On the upside, I learned a few useful practical techniques from this book. Peterson's advice about how to get good exposures in a variety of circumstances is generally good and straightforward. There are also some nice pictures, though in only a few cases does he provide comparisons between the same scene shot well and shot not-so-well.
On the downside, I get the strong impression that Peterson is good at practical advice because he really isn't that good at theory. He explains several basic theoretical concepts, but often in very simplified and occasionally potentially misleading terms. On page 37, he writes that smaller apertures give better sharpness, but fails to mention that too small an aperture will actually lose sharpness due to diffraction. In fact, he never mentions diffraction at all throughout the book. One cannot help but wonder if he even knows about it.
There are also some factual mistakes in the book that seem very strange coming from a professional photographer and instructor. For example, on page 36, he writes that the aperture of a lens is formed by "six overlapping blades." He reinforces this elsewhere by saying that when a lens is stopped down, the out-of-focus highlights (he never uses the common term "bokeh") are "hexagonal." It seems impossible that he could have experience with more than a few different lenses, since while some lenses have six aperture blades and therefore give hexagonal bokeh, many others have five, seven, eight, or nine blades, yielding pentagonal, heptagonal, octagonal, or nonagonal bokeh. Some even have curved aperture blades to more closely approximate a circle. How can he not know this after all his years of working and teaching?
In sum, this isn't a bad book, but it really isn't all that great either. It's an okay choice for the beginner who wants to get some good practical advice without drowning in theory, but anyone who really wants to understand the subject and isn't afraid of a little math should look elsewhere.
Good book but product description is wrong! - Review written on March 04, 2009
Rating: 5 out of 5
1 customer found this review helpful.
This is a great book for beginners like myself. That's why I think the product description on Amazon is for the wrong book: "For serious amateur photographers who already shoot perfectly focused, accurately exposed images but want to be more creative with a camera, here's the book to consult."
This is the book for anyone BUT the person who can "already shoot perfectly focused, accurately exposed images." In fact, the book starts out explaining basics, like what is aperture, don't be afraid of "M" manual mode, etc. So, IGNORE Amazon's description and know that this is a useful book to teach the basics, help you to get to know your camera, and learn some tricks and tips to take better photos.