Overall, this is a pretty good film, although there are some flaws. De Niro, Pesci, Stone and Woods are all excellent. Scorcese makes the usual gratuitous use of violence. I'm not sure we needed to see the head in the vice or the bludgeoning w/ baseball bats. Ace Rothstein's approach to handicapping isn't believable: he'd check the wind to gauge field goals and the type of wood on basketball floors to gauge the bounces. Also, the problems in the marriage of Ace and Ginger seem to have been played out in too many scenes w/ redundancy. The movie was probably about 30 minutes too long, but still worth seeing...

The movie Casino is an insite into when the mob gained controll of a casino. Robert De Niro takes controll of the casino to run it his way onlyand he is tough. Huge amounts of cash are funneld back to the mob. Joe Pesi tries to mussell in and he plays a great part. You get to see the cons trying to beat the tables, Rulett, and the machines. Definately a DVD to own. M Innes Australia.

Casino has to be one of the most underrated films that Martin Scorsese directed in the nineties. The acting by the leads is good and the script is excellent. Robert Deniro gave an Oscar worthy performance and Joe Pesci is chilling yet funny again. Even Sharon Stone is good in this brilliant film.

Martin Scorsese's fascination with America's crime scene examines low-life in Las Vegas in Casino. Though long, this movie remains one of The Master's less heralded production, and I can't figure out why.

Robert DiNiro, Sharon Stone, and Joe Pesci all put in admirable performances. For me, it is impossible to delineate whose is superior. DiNiro's eastern cowboy, Stone's addicted, insecure hustler, and Pesci's violent punk all shine with acing eloquence and nuance.

The picture is pretty -- there's no other way to say it. And, as always, Scorsese's use of contenmporary music creates a soundtrack that tells a part of the story by itself.

This gem has been polished up in this presentation to the point that it shines like it was meant to. The seventies never looked so good.

Although i considered Casino a very good movie, it had its flaws and definately is one of Martin Scorcese's lesser films from that which he has produced in the past. This coming from a big Scorcese fan mind you :D.

Performance wise the film is flawless Robert Deniro and Joe Pesci deliver the goods as always and drive the film into depth so much more than if someone else were to play the parts. Also Sharron Stone delivers a rare great performance through the directing of Martin scorcese.

Based upon The crumbling of the mobs casino organisation, this movie dwelves into the day by day events that occur within the casino. All the misfits, scammers and what happens to those caught ripping off from the mobs money.
When things start to go wrong robert deniro, joe pesci and sharron stone's characters start to create conflict amongst one another and things only become worse as the mobster world begins to crumble.

The film has a great story and great visuals, the only problem i found within the film was i was a little thrown off by the constant voice over dialogue. In some scenes it is horribly misplaced and in some others it has been used in ways which were unneccesary and could have been told through the visual storytelling.

None the less Casino is a good film and i suggest that you should certainly watch it especially if you are a scorcese fan =).