by Microsoft
| Average Rating: |
|
| Sales Rank: | 1062 (lower is better) |
| Price Used: | $13.97 |
| Shipping: | Free Shipping on most orders over $25* |
| Availability: | |
| Release Date: | 2004-01-13 |
| Label: | Microsoft |
| UPC: | 805529390072 |
| Binding: | CD-ROM |
| Published By: | Microsoft |
| ASIN: | B000096L71 |
| Category: | Video Games |
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2004: A Century of Flight Features
- Dynamic weather system based on realistic atmospheric physics, with true three-dimensional clouds that form and dissipate
- Worldwide scenery with accurate 3D terrain and auto-gen objects that fill in the world with appropriate buildings and vegetation
- Enhanced interactive air traffic control (ATC), including traffic at all airports around the world
- Improved support for 3D graphics hardware acceleration in multiple windows and across multiple monitors
- For 1 or more players over LAN or Internet
Editorial Reviews and Product Descriptions
Product Description
Flight Simulator 2004: A Century Of Flight celebrates the world-altering invention of powered flight -- by taking you on a tour of great aircraft from the past and present! Complete set of historical and modern-day aircraft to fly, from the Wright Brothers' Flyer I to the Boeing 747-700
Customer Reviews
Love it. Less taxing on your system than Flight Simulator X - Reviewed on 2008-04-14
2 customers found this review helpful.
My son Henry and I enjoy flight simulating together. Our last version was 2002, and the 2004 version is far superior. Most noticeable is an increase in the graphics quality of terrain and clouds/weather. The realism of 2004 is certainly acceptable, and is closer to "X" than to 2002.
More importantly, it runs acceptably (even nicely) on lower horsepower machines...I have it on a Sony laptop (1280x768, ~500MHz Pentium M, 512k RAM, XP SP2) with most sliders set to "high quality" (including bilinear anti-aliasing), and we get a pretty reliable 17-18 frames per second (fps). For us, that's a requirement for good control; lower than that and we both get frustrated.
By comparison, "X" on the same machine, with quality set mostly "Low", barely can get 10 fps. So, there's a big difference in performance.
In short, if you've got a machine of limited resources (especially the 3D graphics chip), stick with 2004. It's almost as good as "X", and you won't be frustrated with lower frame rates. Of course, if you've got a fancy new GPU from Nvidia, go for "X"; it's really great.
* - See Amazon
Product Page for shipping and pricing details.